← Search

Karen Johnson

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Toledo, OH
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
216 matches · 90W–126L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history216 matches
L
2026-10-27 · NWO 6.5W Combo Tues McDougle/Lankford - Launchpad · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Andi Melvin
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 4-3, 0-1
W
2026-10-25 · NWO 6.5W Combo Bloomquist-SVC · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Ashlee Assenmacher
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 2-1
L
2026-10-20 · NWO 6.5W Combo Tues McDougle/Lankford - Launchpad · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Brandi Walerius
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 5-4, 0-1
L
2026-08-09 · NWO 18&Over 3.0W Duckett/Lyon-SVC · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jessica Gralak championship
loading the estimate
6-3, 4-6, 0-1
L
2026-08-08 · NWO 18&Over 3.0W Duckett/Lyon-SVC · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Karen Dillon championship
loading the estimate
2-6, 3-6
L
2026-08-02 · NWO 40&Over 3.0W Glosser/Worth-Jermain · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Nicole Worth championship
loading the estimate
2-6, 2-6
W
2026-08-01 · NWO 18&Over 3.0W Duckett/Lyon-SVC · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jessica Gralak championship
loading the estimate
7-5, 6-4
W
2026-08-01 · NWO 18&Over 3.0W Duckett/Lyon-SVC · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Karen Dillon championship
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-2
L
2026-07-28 · NWO 18&Over 3.5W DAY Babbitt/Glosser-SVC · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Mary Morrison
loading the estimate
1-6, 3-6
L
2026-07-23 · NWO 40&Over 3.0W Glosser/Worth-Jermain · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Heidi Glosser
loading the estimate
4-6, 2-6
W
2026-07-21 · NWO 40&Over 3.0W Glosser/Worth-Jermain · #4 Doubles · 3.0 · with Nicole Worth
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-4
W
2026-07-21 · NWO 18&Over 3.5W DAY Babbitt/Glosser-SVC · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jennifer Walton
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-3
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams39 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
2.5
75%
6W–2L · 58.3% of games
3.0
45.2%
52W–63L · 49% of games
3.5
18.2%
8W–36L · 38% of games
5.5
55.6%
5W–4L · 47.7% of games
6.5
47.5%
19W–21L · 45.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 38% of the time
#2 Doubles
38%
81 matches
#1 Doubles
32%
70 matches
#3 Doubles
25%
54 matches
#1 Singles
2%
5 matches
#2 Singles
2%
4 matches
#4 Doubles
1%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams