← Search

Heidi Glosser

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Ottawa Hills, OH
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
209 matches · 97W–112L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history209 matches
L
2026-08-08 · NWO 18&Over 3.0W Duckett/Lyon-SVC · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kelly Links championship
loading the estimate
6-2, 4-6, 0-1
W
2026-08-04 · NWO 55&Over 6.0W Zacharias/Worth-Bedford · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Lisa Matuszak
loading the estimate
6-4, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-08-02 · NWO 40&Over 3.0W Glosser/Worth-Jermain · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Suzie Tsang championship
loading the estimate
2-6, 5-7
L
2026-08-02 · NWO 40&Over 3.0W Glosser/Worth-Jermain · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Suzie Tsang championship
loading the estimate
2-6, 4-6
W
2026-08-01 · NWO 18&Over 3.0W Duckett/Lyon-SVC · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kelly Links championship
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-1
L
2026-07-23 · NWO 40&Over 3.0W Glosser/Worth-Jermain · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Karen Johnson
loading the estimate
4-6, 2-6
W
2026-07-21 · NWO 40&Over 3.0W Glosser/Worth-Jermain · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Suzie Tsang
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-7, 1-0
W
2026-07-21 · NWO 18&Over 3.5W DAY Babbitt/Glosser-SVC · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Anna Berakis
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-1
L
2026-07-14 · NWO 18&Over 3.5W DAY Babbitt/Glosser-SVC · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Mary Morrison
loading the estimate
0-6, 0-6
L
2026-07-10 · NWO 40&Over 3.0W Glosser/Worth-Jermain · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Drew Stiles
loading the estimate
6-4, 3-6, 0-1
W
2026-07-07 · NWO 55&Over 6.0W Zacharias/Worth-Bedford · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Lisa Matuszak
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-3
L
2026-07-07 · NWO 18&Over 3.5W DAY Babbitt/Glosser-SVC · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Terri Crestani-Kozy
loading the estimate
2-6, 1-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams37 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
2.5
80%
8W–2L · 60% of games
3.0
53.7%
66W–57L · 50.4% of games
3.5
15.8%
6W–32L · 32.4% of games
5.5
60%
6W–4L · 50.3% of games
6.0
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.5
34.8%
8W–15L · 39.8% of games
6.0mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 31% of the time
#3 Doubles
31%
64 matches
#2 Doubles
30%
63 matches
#1 Doubles
27%
57 matches
#2 Singles
5%
10 matches
#1 Singles
4%
9 matches
#4 Doubles
3%
6 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova