← Search

Kelly Cody

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Sylvania, OH
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
232 matches · 86W–146L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history232 matches
L
2026-10-25 · NWO 6.5W Combo Banker/Cody-TWOS · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Renu Kielhorn
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 1-4, 0-1
L
2026-10-17 · NWO 7.5W Combo McDougle - Launchpad · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Colleen Lavoy
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 1-6
L
2026-10-10 · NWO 7.5W Combo McDougle - Launchpad · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Sara Johnson
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 5-0, 0-1
W
2026-10-04 · NWO 6.5W Combo Banker/Cody-TWOS · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Renu Kielhorn
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 5-2, 1-0
L
2026-09-26 · NWO 7.5W Combo McDougle - Launchpad · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Joanna Lewinski
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 1-6
L
2026-09-13 · NWO 18&Over 7.0MX Keating/Cody Twos · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Tory Savage mixed championship
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 1-6
L
2026-08-23 · NWO 40&Over 3.5W Walton/Nejedlik-SVC · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Nicole Banker championship
loading the estimate
5-7, 4-6
L
2026-08-22 · NWO 40&Over 3.5W Walton/Nejedlik-SVC · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Nicole Banker championship
loading the estimate
2-6, 1-6
L
2026-08-22 · NWO 40&Over 3.5W Walton/Nejedlik-SVC · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Nicole Banker championship
loading the estimate
3-6, 3-6
W
2026-08-07 · NWO 40&Over 3.5W Walton/Nejedlik-SVC · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Nicole Banker championship
loading the estimate
6-0, 6-2
W
2026-08-02 · NWO 40&Over 3.5W Walton/Nejedlik-SVC · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Nicole Banker championship
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-1
L
2026-08-02 · NWO 40&Over 3.5W Walton/Nejedlik-SVC · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Nicole Banker championship
loading the estimate
5-7, 3-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams45 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level9 levels played
2.5
48.1%
13W–14L · 52.2% of games
3.0
52.8%
19W–17L · 49.2% of games
3.5
34.8%
24W–45L · 44.9% of games
4.0
0%
0W–6L · 17.2% of games
5.5
28.6%
8W–20L · 43.2% of games
6.5
31.6%
6W–13L · 39.7% of games
7.5
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
47.4%
9W–10L · 49.5% of games
7.0mixed
28%
7W–18L · 41.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 38% of the time
#2 Doubles
38%
87 matches
#1 Doubles
37%
85 matches
#3 Doubles
19%
45 matches
#4 Doubles
3%
8 matches
#2 Singles
2%
5 matches
#1 Singles
1%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I don’t want to be somebody else. I want to be myself and win in my way.
Rafael Nadal