← Search

Laura Nejedlik

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Lambertville, MI
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
234 matches · 176W–58L · seasons 2018–2026
Match history234 matches
L
2026-11-01 · NWO 8.5W Combo Kraus-SVC · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Madison Arquette
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 4-3, 0-1
W
2026-10-23 · LIB-Sauld 7.5W Weekend Combo F · #2 Doubles · with Elissa Bayraktar
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 7-5
L
2026-10-18 · NWO 6.5W Combo Bloomquist-SVC · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Jackie Kapuscinski
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 0-3
W
2026-10-17 · LIB-Sauld 7.5W Weekend Combo F · #2 Doubles · with Ashley Mooney
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 7-6, 1-0
W
2026-10-14 · NWO 8.5W Combo Kraus-SVC · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Madison Arquette
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 5-4, 1-0
L
2026-10-10 · CHIP-Shaw 3.5W Fall Singles F1 · #2 Singles · 3.5
loading the estimate
3-6, 2-4
L
2026-10-09 · LIB-Sauld 7.5W Weekend Combo F · #2 Doubles · with Laura LeVasseur
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 1-2
L
2026-09-27 · NWO 6.5W Combo Bloomquist-SVC · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Kathryn Clarke-Stumbo
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 2-4
W
2026-09-13 · NWO 18&Over 7.0MX Jacobs/Walton -SVC · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kevin Green mixed championship
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 6-1
L
2026-09-13 · NWO 18&Over 7.0MX Jacobs/Walton -SVC · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kevin Green mixed championship
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 2-6
W
2026-08-23 · NWO 40&Over 3.5W Walton/Nejedlik-SVC · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jennifer Walton championship
loading the estimate
7-5, 5-7, 1-0
L
2026-08-22 · NWO 40&Over 3.5W Walton/Nejedlik-SVC · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jennifer Walton championship
loading the estimate
0-6, 3-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams43 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level10 levels played
2.5
80%
4W–1L · 57.6% of games
3.0
100%
8W–0L · 72.3% of games
3.5
84%
100W–19L · 62.4% of games
4.0
47.4%
9W–10L · 48.9% of games
5.5
100%
5W–0L · 73.8% of games
6.5
66.7%
8W–4L · 53.3% of games
7.5
70.6%
12W–5L · 58.4% of games
8.5
75%
3W–1L · 50.7% of games
6.0mixed
62.5%
5W–3L · 65.6% of games
7.0mixed
59.4%
19W–13L · 53% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 48% of the time
#1 Doubles
48%
112 matches
#2 Doubles
31%
73 matches
#3 Doubles
16%
37 matches
#1 Singles
3%
6 matches
#2 Singles
2%
4 matches
Singles
1%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Tennis is mostly mental. You win or lose the match before you even go out there.
Venus Williams