← Search

Jennifer Walton

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Toledo, OH
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
346 matches · 233W–113L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history346 matches
W
2026-10-11 · NWO 6.5W Combo Bloomquist-SVC · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Kelly Riordan
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-2
W
2026-10-11 · NWO 8.5W Combo Kraus-SVC · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Madison Arquette
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 2-0
W
2026-09-27 · NWO 6.5W Combo Bloomquist-SVC · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Debra Bloomquist
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 4-0
W
2026-08-31 · NWO 55&Over 7.0MX Jacobs-SVC · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with David Ensing mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 5-4
W
2026-08-23 · NWO 40&Over 3.5W Walton/Nejedlik-SVC · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Laura Nejedlik championship
loading the estimate
7-5, 5-7, 1-0
L
2026-08-22 · NWO 40&Over 3.5W Walton/Nejedlik-SVC · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Laura Nejedlik championship
loading the estimate
0-6, 3-6
W
2026-08-22 · NWO 40&Over 3.5W Walton/Nejedlik-SVC · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Laura Nejedlik championship
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-2
L
2026-08-21 · NWO 40&Over 3.5W Walton/Nejedlik-SVC · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Laura Nejedlik championship
loading the estimate
1-6, 4-6
W
2026-08-10 · NWO 55&Over 7.0MX Jacobs-SVC · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with David Ensing mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-08-07 · NWO 40&Over 3.5W Walton/Nejedlik-SVC · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Laura Nejedlik championship
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-2
W
2026-08-07 · NWO 40&Over 3.5W Walton/Nejedlik-SVC · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Laura Nejedlik championship
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-3
W
2026-08-02 · NWO 40&Over 3.5W Walton/Nejedlik-SVC · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Laura Nejedlik championship
loading the estimate
7-5, 6-7, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams70 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
2.5
55.6%
5W–4L · 52.3% of games
3.5
75.5%
105W–34L · 59.5% of games
4.0
54.1%
20W–17L · 54.7% of games
6.5
58.3%
14W–10L · 53.5% of games
7.5
72.3%
47W–18L · 58.3% of games
8.5
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
59.1%
26W–18L · 53.4% of games
8.0mixed
45.5%
10W–12L · 52.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 47% of the time
#1 Doubles
47%
164 matches
#2 Doubles
29%
101 matches
#3 Doubles
21%
73 matches
#1 Singles
1%
4 matches
#4 Doubles
1%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to take the initiative and play your game. Confidence is just believing you can do it.
Chris Evert