← Search

Adrienne Pilewski

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Sylvania, OH
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
467 matches · 232W–235L · seasons 2017–2026
Match history467 matches
L
2026-10-25 · NWO 6.5W Combo Pilewski-SVC · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Stefanie Calderone
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 5-1, 0-1
L
2026-10-04 · NWO 6.5W Combo Pilewski-SVC · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Hope Modlin
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 5-2, 0-1
L
2026-09-26 · NWO 7.5W Combo Barnes/Bryant-SVC · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Annsley Mann
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 2-4
W
2026-08-27 · NWO 55&Over 7.0 MX Kapuscinski-Launchpad · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jim Pilewski mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 7-5
W
2026-08-24 · NWO 55&Over 7.0 MX Kapuscinski-Launchpad · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jim Pilewski mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-08-16 · NWO 55&Over 7.0 MX Kapuscinski-Launchpad · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jeff Renner mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 3-6
W
2026-08-13 · NWO 55&Over 7.0W Bloomquist-AW · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Lori Dixon
loading the estimate
6-1, 7-5
L
2026-08-10 · NWO 55&Over 7.0 MX Kapuscinski-Launchpad · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jim Pilewski mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 3-6
L
2026-08-01 · #2 Singles · 3.5 championship
loading the estimate
2-6, 5-7
L
2026-08-01 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Laura Langsdorf championship
loading the estimate
4-6, 2-6
W
2026-07-30 · NWO 55&Over 7.0W Bloomquist-AW · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kimberly Turner
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-4
W
2026-07-29 · NWO 18&Over 3.5W Walton/Nejedlik-SVC · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Amy Graff
loading the estimate
7-5, 6-4
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams63 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
3.5
63%
138W–81L · 56% of games
4.0
19.8%
16W–65L · 37.1% of games
6.5
50%
13W–13L · 51.8% of games
7.0
100%
4W–0L · 62.3% of games
7.5
46.8%
22W–25L · 48.2% of games
7.0mixed
47.4%
36W–40L · 49% of games
8.0mixed
21.4%
3W–11L · 37.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 26% of the time
#1 Doubles
26%
120 matches
#2 Doubles
24%
114 matches
#3 Doubles
20%
93 matches
#1 Singles
16%
73 matches
#2 Singles
13%
61 matches
#4 Doubles
1%
6 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams