← Search

Laura Langsdorf

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Sylvania, OH
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
117 matches · 61W–56L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history117 matches
W
2026-08-23 · NWO 40&Over 3.5W Walton/Nejedlik-SVC · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Mary Ann Holmes championship
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-2
L
2026-08-22 · NWO 40&Over 3.5W Walton/Nejedlik-SVC · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Mary Ann Holmes championship
loading the estimate
2-6, 2-6
W
2026-08-22 · NWO 40&Over 3.5W Walton/Nejedlik-SVC · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Mary Ann Holmes championship
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-4
L
2026-08-21 · NWO 40&Over 3.5W Walton/Nejedlik-SVC · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Mary Ann Holmes championship
loading the estimate
2-6, 2-6
W
2026-08-07 · NWO 40&Over 3.5W Walton/Nejedlik-SVC · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Mary Ann Holmes championship
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-4
W
2026-08-07 · NWO 40&Over 3.5W Walton/Nejedlik-SVC · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Mary Ann Holmes championship
loading the estimate
7-6, 1-6, 1-0
W
2026-08-02 · NWO 40&Over 3.5W Walton/Nejedlik-SVC · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Mary Ann Holmes championship
loading the estimate
1-6, 6-1, 1-0
W
2026-08-02 · NWO 40&Over 3.5W Walton/Nejedlik-SVC · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Mary Ann Holmes championship
loading the estimate
6-0, 6-1
L
2026-08-01 · NWO 18&Over 3.5W Walton/Nejedlik-SVC · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Adrienne Pilewski championship
loading the estimate
4-6, 2-6
L
2026-07-28 · NWO 40&Over 4.0W Langsdorf-SVC · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Mary Ann Holmes
loading the estimate
6-4, 1-6, 0-1
L
2026-07-23 · NWO 55&Over 7.0W Day Gibbons-SVC · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Martha Loss
loading the estimate
3-6, 5-7
W
2026-07-20 · NWO 40&Over 3.5W Walton/Nejedlik-SVC · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Mary Ann Holmes
loading the estimate
7-5, 6-3
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams29 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
2.5
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.5
71.4%
35W–14L · 59.5% of games
4.0
33.3%
14W–28L · 43.8% of games
6.5
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0
60%
3W–2L · 58.8% of games
7.5
28.6%
2W–5L · 39.2% of games
7.0mixed
54.5%
6W–5L · 50.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 54% of the time
#1 Doubles
54%
63 matches
#3 Doubles
26%
30 matches
#2 Doubles
20%
23 matches
#4 Doubles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You can get through anything if you keep going one point at a time.
Arthur Ashe