← Search

Carol Zembinski

Elm Grove, WI
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
129 matches · 62W–67L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Carol Zembinski to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history129 matches
W
Cana Comer / Lauren Hansen
2026-09-09 · WI Combo 7.5W GML Wirth Park Moskow · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Kristyn Klind
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-2
L
2026-08-19 · WI Combo 7.5W GML Wirth Park Moskow · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Melissa Lee-Sundlov
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 0-6
L
Sara King / Megan Hambrook
2026-08-12 · WI Combo 7.5W GML Wirth Park Moskow · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Karen Moskow
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 6-4, 0-1
W
2026-08-09 · #4 Doubles · with Silvia Zapien championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
L
2026-08-09 · #3 Doubles · with Silvia Zapien championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 3-6, 0-1
W
Sheila Butrym / Debbie Schneider
2026-08-08 · #2 Doubles · with Karen Moskow championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 1-6, 1-0
W
2026-08-01 · #1 Doubles · with Karen Moskow championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 5-7, 1-0
W
2026-08-01 · #4 Doubles · with Silvia Zapien championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-3
W
2026-07-31 · #4 Doubles · with Silvia Zapien championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
L
2026-07-27 · WI Adult 55&O 8.0W GML North Shore Elite Fondrie · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Karen Moskow
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 7-5, 1-0
L
2026-07-23 · WI Adult 40&O 4.0W GML Brookfield East HS Moskow · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Johanna Gross
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
L
2026-07-22 · WI Adult 18&O 3.5W GML Brookfield Elite Harmelink · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams22 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
3.5
57.8%
37W–27L · 54.3% of games
4.0
16.7%
3W–15L · 38.7% of games
6.5
50%
2W–2L · 47.3% of games
7.0
100%
4W–0L · 60.3% of games
7.5
36.8%
7W–12L · 41.3% of games
8.0
12.5%
1W–7L · 38.3% of games
8.0mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 33% of the time
#3 Doubles
33%
43 matches
#2 Doubles
29%
37 matches
#1 Doubles
15%
19 matches
#4 Doubles
10%
13 matches
#2 Singles
9%
12 matches
#1 Singles
4%
5 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer