← Search

Cana Comer

Milwaukee, WI
3.5C year-end 2025
94 matches · 41W–53L · seasons 2021–2026
Bump probability
3.03.54.0lowhigh
Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely.
i
The dashed lines are the edges of your band. The three shaded areas are exactly the three percentages below — area here is the chance of one outcome for you, not a count of players.
3.51
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 19 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 3.0
44%
stay 3.5
56%
up to 4.0
Projected to December: 0% down · 82% stay · 18% up, from a year-end estimate of 3.43. Lower than today’s 3.51 because form regresses — players this far above their band partway through a season have historically finished nearer the middle of it. Keep playing at this level and the numbers above are the ones that hold.

A 3.5 runs from 3.01 to 3.50. This rating sits in the top of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure.
i
scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model. USTA publishes year-end ratings in December, which is when this gets graded against what actually happened.
Where you rank
Milwaukee · 3.5
6 of 28
WI · 3.5
20 of 187
By our estimated rating, not the published level.
i
Cana is ranked against players at the same level in the same place. The published level is identical for everyone in a band, so it cannot separate them — our estimate can. Groups smaller than five are not ranked at all, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Cana has been 3.5 for all 6 seasons on record, but moved a long way inside it — from the bottom of the band to the top.

3.03.5202120222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history. The smaller, faded points — 2021 — rest on fewer than 5 matches, where the estimate is mostly the level the player was entered at rather than anything they did on court. Read the shape, not the value.

How you rank at your level
At 3.5, Cana has gone from the 3rd to the 71st percentile of players at that level, 2022 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level4 levels played
3.0
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
3.5
49.1%
28W–29L · 46.3% of games
6.5
45.8%
11W–13L · 51.1% of games
7.5
0%
0W–8L · 37.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history94 matches
W
2026-07-22 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lauren Hansen
expectation pending — we're still fetching an opponent's record
6-2, 2-6, 1-0
W
2026-07-20 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lauren Hansen
expectation pending — we're still fetching an opponent's record
6-1, 6-2
L
Kristin Marlier / Olof Jonsdottir
2026-07-15 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lauren Johnson
expectation pending — we're still fetching an opponent's record
6-3, 7-5
W
Karen Stromsted / Linda Koenig
2026-07-13 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Dina Davis
expectation pending — we're still fetching an opponent's record
7-5, 6-3
L
2026-07-08 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Ellen Kelderman
−0.021below expectation — took 44% of games against 53% expected
7-6, 7-5
W
Linda Curtis / Patrice Michaels
2026-07-06 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Ellen Kelderman
expectation pending — we're still fetching an opponent's record
6-1, 6-3
W
Christine Frank / Sharon Buell
2026-07-01 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lauren Johnson
expectation pending — we're still fetching an opponent's record
6-2, 6-2
W
Maureen Kelly / Kathy Eberle
2026-06-29 · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Gail Thorpe
expectation pending — we're still fetching an opponent's record
6-1, 6-1
L
Susan Fondrie / Deborah Soule
2026-06-24 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lauren Johnson
expectation pending — we're still fetching an opponent's record
7-6, 5-7, 1-0
L
2026-06-22 · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Christie Ortwein
expectation pending — we're still fetching an opponent's record
7-5, 6-4
W
2026-06-10 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lauren Hansen
expectation pending — we're still fetching an opponent's record
6-4, 1-6, 1-0
W
Kerri Lewis / Margaret Oteman
2026-06-08 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Ellen Kelderman
expectation pending — we're still fetching an opponent's record
3-6, 6-3, 1-0
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.