Search

Gail Thorpe

Mequon, WI
3.0C year-end 2025
128 matches · 59W–69L · seasons 20192026
Bump probability
2.53.03.5lowhigh
Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely.
i
The dashed lines are the edges of your band. The three shaded areas are exactly the three percentages below — area here is the chance of one outcome for you, not a count of players.
3.06
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 22 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 2.5
22%
stay 3.0
78%
up to 3.5
Projected to December: 0% down · 67% stay · 33% up, from a year-end estimate of 2.96. Lower than today’s 3.06 because form regresses — players this far above their band partway through a season have historically finished nearer the middle of it. Keep playing at this level and the numbers above are the ones that hold.

A 3.0 runs from 2.51 to 3.00. This rating sits in the top of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure.
i
scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model. USTA publishes year-end ratings in December, which is when this gets graded against what actually happened.
Where you rank
WI · 3.0
30 of 88
By our estimated rating, not the published level.
i
Gail is ranked against players at the same level in the same place. The published level is identical for everyone in a band, so it cannot separate them — our estimate can. Groups smaller than five are not ranked at all, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Gail has played at 3.0, 3.5 across 7 seasons — 1 move up and 1 down.

2.53.03.52019202120222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history. The smaller, faded points — 2019 — rest on fewer than 5 matches, where the estimate is mostly the level the player was entered at rather than anything they did on court. Read the shape, not the value.

How you rank at your level
At 6.0, Gail has gone from the 12th to the 73rd percentile of players at that level, 2022 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level5 levels played
3.0
51.7%
15W–14L · 50.7% of games
3.5
21.7%
5W–18L · 36.5% of games
6.0
58.3%
14W–10L · 53.6% of games
6.5
50%
15W–15L · 50.8% of games
7.0
45.5%
10W–12L · 47.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history128 matches
W
Jill Federspill / Tracy Ford
2026-07-28 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Karen Lucey
expectation pending — we're still fetching an opponent's record
6-1, 7-6
W
2026-07-24 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Lisa Stengel
0.009about as expected — took 65% of games against 64% expected
7-6, 6-1
L
Lina Cicero / Lynn Doyle
2026-07-10 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Lisa Stengel
expectation pending — we're still fetching an opponent's record
6-3, 5-7, 1-0
L
Anja Beckmann / Kate McKenzie
2026-07-08 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Katharine Marinan
expectation pending — we're still fetching an opponent's record
6-3, 2-6, 1-0
W
2026-06-30 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Karen Lucey
+0.001better than expected — took 80% of games against 70% expected
6-1, 6-2
W
Maureen Kelly / Kathy Eberle
2026-06-29 · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Cana Comer
expectation pending — we're still fetching an opponent's record
6-1, 6-1
W
2026-06-26 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Lisa Stengel
+0.010better than expected — took 75% of games against 64% expected
6-0, 6-4
W
Vicki Cecalupo / Mary Ellen O'Neill
2026-06-24 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Judith Bednar
expectation pending — we're still fetching an opponent's record
6-1, 6-0
W
2026-06-23 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Karen Lucey
+0.023better than expected — took 86% of games against 66% expected
6-1, 6-1
W
2026-06-05 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Lisa Stengel
+0.006about as expected — took 57% of games against 53% expected
6-4, 7-6
L
Paula Bergquist / Julie Courtney
2026-06-02 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Theresa Seem
expectation pending — we're still fetching an opponent's record
7-5, 6-2
W
Kate McKenzie / Cathy Rozewicz
2026-05-27 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Katharine Marinan
expectation pending — we're still fetching an opponent's record
6-1, 6-3
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.