← Search

Tami Vincent

Fox Point, WI
3.5C year-end 2025
149 matches · 105W–44L · seasons 2019–2026
Bump probability
3.03.54.0lowhigh
Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely.
i
The dashed lines are the edges of your band. The three shaded areas are exactly the three percentages below — area here is the chance of one outcome for you, not a count of players.
3.62
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 7 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 3.0
6%
stay 3.5
94%
up to 4.0
Projected to December: 0% down · 45% stay · 55% up, from a year-end estimate of 3.51. Lower than today’s 3.62 because form regresses — players this far above their band partway through a season have historically finished nearer the middle of it. Keep playing at this level and the numbers above are the ones that hold.

A 3.5 runs from 3.01 to 3.50. This rating sits in the top of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure.
i
scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model. USTA publishes year-end ratings in December, which is when this gets graded against what actually happened.
Where you rank
WI · 3.5
3 of 187
By our estimated rating, not the published level.
i
Tami is ranked against players at the same level in the same place. The published level is identical for everyone in a band, so it cannot separate them — our estimate can. Groups smaller than five are not ranked at all, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Tami has played at 3.0, 3.5 across 7 seasons — 1 move up and 0 down.

2.53.03.52019202120222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 3.5, Tami has gone from the 60th to the 98th percentile of players at that level, 2021 to 2025.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level6 levels played
0.0
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.0
88.2%
15W–2L · 71.4% of games
3.5
71.6%
48W–19L · 59.5% of games
4.0
35.7%
5W–9L · 46.7% of games
6.5
69.2%
18W–8L · 57% of games
7.5
70%
7W–3L · 55.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history149 matches
L
Cana Comer / Lauren Hansen
2026-07-22 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sarah Langerman
expectation pending — we're still fetching an opponent's record
6-2, 2-6, 1-0
L
2026-07-16 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Suzanne Thomas
−0.021below expectation — took 41% of games against 51% expected
6-7, 6-2, 1-0
W
2026-06-18 · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kamal Irani
expectation pending — we're still fetching an opponent's record
6-0, 6-0
W
Katelyn Stritzel / Michelle Godden
2026-06-17 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sarah Langerman
expectation pending — we're still fetching an opponent's record
6-0, 6-3
L
2026-06-11 · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sara Feider
+0.021better than expected — took 53% of games against 42% expected
1-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-06-10 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Leah Damron
−0.058below expectation — took 25% of games against 54% expected
6-2, 6-2
W
Ellen Kelderman / Victoria Underwood
2026-06-03 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sarah Langerman
expectation pending — we're still fetching an opponent's record
6-4, 6-4
W
Carolyn Hottinger / Sarah Evans
2025-10-02 · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Eileen Pfeifer
expectation pending — we're still fetching an opponent's record
6-3, 6-4
W
Sarah Evans / Rosemary Morby
2025-09-11 · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Susan Melian
expectation pending — we're still fetching an opponent's record
7-6, 6-3
L
Charlotte Toboyek / Margaret Hayes
2025-09-10 · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Lisa Ellegard
expectation pending — we're still fetching an opponent's record
7-6, 6-2
W
2025-08-20 · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Sarah Langerman
+0.050better than expected — took 67% of games against 43% expected
6-3, 6-3
W
2025-08-03 · #2 Doubles · with Sarah Langerman
−0.008about as expected — took 47% of games against 52% expected
6-4, 2-6, 1-0
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.