Teams

WI Combo 7.5W GML North Shore Elite Westreich

2026 WI Combo · WI Combo 7.5 Women

10 players · average NTRP 3.80 / WISCONSIN

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
W#1 DoublesSarah Langerman / Sara van Beckum vs Christi Witt / Joyce Coury6-4, 6-2
L#2 DoublesLeah Damron / Heather Szerbat vs Tina Kadrich / Beth LambrechtScasny1-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesPatrice Vitucci-Kessenich / Julie Borjon vs Susan Lutz / Kathleen Dubiel3-6, 4-6
W#1 DoublesSara Feider / Sara van Beckum vs Nicole Penegor / Andrea Rowe6-4, 6-4
W#2 DoublesDiane Harmening / Tami Vincent vs Rachel Symes Orosz / Susan Fondrie6-0, 6-2
W#3 DoublesHeather Szerbat / Julie Borjon vs Carol Zembinski / Melissa Lee-Sundlov6-0, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WI Combo 7.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.61 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.05
Jane Westreich
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
3.92
Diane Harmening
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.86
Sara van Beckum
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.85
Patrice Vitucci-Kessenich
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.52
Heather Szerbat
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.43
Sarah Langerman
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.40
Sara Feider
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.39
Tami Vincent
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.35
Julie Borjon
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.34
Leah Damron
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sarah Langerman + Sara van Beckum5258% games+9.1% vs expected
Tami Vincent + Sarah Langerman27861% games+8.5% vs expected
Heather Szerbat + Leah Damron321558% games+3.8% vs expected
Tami Vincent + Leah Damron4455% games−3.9% vs expected
Sarah Langerman + Heather Szerbat4171% gamesnot enough data
Sarah Langerman + Leah Damron3256% gamesnot enough data
Jane Westreich + Patrice Vitucci-Kessenich213 matchesnot enough data
Tami Vincent + Heather Szerbat213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Jane Westreich
75W–66L career · 1 line in 2026
36%64%<1%
4.05
4
Diane Harmening
65W–50L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%72%28%
3.92
4
Sara van Beckum
85W–48L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%84%16%
3.86
4
Patrice Vitucci-Kessenich
54W–31L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%86%13%
3.85
4
Heather Szerbat
86W–29L career · 2 lines in 2026
46%54%<1%
3.52
3.5
Sarah Langerman
67W–28L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%69%31%
3.43
3.5
Sara Feider
108W–48L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%75%25%
3.40
3.5
Tami Vincent
106W–44L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%78%21%
3.39
3.5
Julie Borjon
92W–55L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%86%13%
3.35
3.5
Leah Damron
70W–36L career · 1 line in 2026
1%86%13%
3.34

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.