← Search

Martha Loss

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Toledo, OH
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
63 matches · 43W–20L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history63 matches
W
2026-08-23 · NWO 40&Over 3.5W Walton/Nejedlik-SVC · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Wendy Poitinger championship
loading the estimate
7-6, 2-6, 1-0
L
2026-08-22 · NWO 40&Over 3.5W Walton/Nejedlik-SVC · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Wendy Poitinger championship
loading the estimate
3-6, 1-6
W
2026-08-22 · NWO 40&Over 3.5W Walton/Nejedlik-SVC · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Wendy Poitinger championship
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-08-21 · NWO 40&Over 3.5W Walton/Nejedlik-SVC · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Wendy Poitinger championship
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-08-13 · NWO 55&Over 7.0W Day Gibbons-SVC · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Rebecca Chen
loading the estimate
6-0, 6-1
W
2026-08-07 · NWO 40&Over 3.5W Walton/Nejedlik-SVC · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Wendy Poitinger championship
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-4
W
2026-08-07 · NWO 40&Over 3.5W Walton/Nejedlik-SVC · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Wendy Poitinger championship
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-08-02 · NWO 40&Over 3.5W Walton/Nejedlik-SVC · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Rebecca Chen championship
loading the estimate
5-7, 7-5, 1-0
W
2026-08-02 · NWO 40&Over 3.5W Walton/Nejedlik-SVC · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Wendy Poitinger championship
loading the estimate
6-0, 6-1
L
2026-07-28 · NWO 40&Over 4.0W Langsdorf-SVC · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Diane Belinske
loading the estimate
1-6, 4-6
W
Default
2026-07-27 · NWO 40&Over 3.5W Walton/Nejedlik-SVC · #1 Singles · 3.5
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-07-23 · NWO 55&Over 7.0W Day Gibbons-SVC · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Laura Langsdorf
loading the estimate
3-6, 5-7
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams11 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.5
80%
24W–6L · 61.8% of games
4.0
30.8%
4W–9L · 41.1% of games
7.0
87.5%
14W–2L · 63.7% of games
7.5
25%
1W–3L · 40% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 35% of the time
#2 Doubles
35%
22 matches
#3 Doubles
30%
19 matches
#1 Doubles
18%
11 matches
#4 Doubles
16%
10 matches
#1 Singles
2%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer