← Search

Wendy Poitinger

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Toledo, OH
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
416 matches · 266W–150L · seasons 2016–2026
Match history416 matches
W
2026-10-25 · NWO 6.5W Combo Bloomquist-SVC · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Kennedy Broadwell
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-0
W
2026-10-11 · NWO 6.5W Combo Bloomquist-SVC · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Kennedy Broadwell
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 2-0
L
2026-09-13 · NWO 55&Over 7.0W DAY Bloomquist-AW · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Dede Zeiger championship
loading the estimate
0-6, 3-6
W
2026-08-23 · NWO 40&Over 3.5W Walton/Nejedlik-SVC · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Martha Loss championship
loading the estimate
7-6, 2-6, 1-0
L
2026-08-22 · NWO 40&Over 3.5W Walton/Nejedlik-SVC · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Martha Loss championship
loading the estimate
3-6, 1-6
W
2026-08-22 · NWO 40&Over 3.5W Walton/Nejedlik-SVC · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Martha Loss championship
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-08-21 · NWO 40&Over 3.5W Walton/Nejedlik-SVC · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Martha Loss championship
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-08-07 · NWO 40&Over 3.5W Walton/Nejedlik-SVC · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Martha Loss championship
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-4
W
2026-08-07 · NWO 40&Over 3.5W Walton/Nejedlik-SVC · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Martha Loss championship
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-08-06 · NWO 55&Over 7.0W DAY Bloomquist-AW · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Penny Henderson
loading the estimate
3-6, 7-5, 1-0
W
2026-08-02 · NWO 40&Over 3.5W Walton/Nejedlik-SVC · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Martha Loss championship
loading the estimate
6-0, 6-1
W
2026-07-22 · NWO 18&Over 3.5W Walton/Nejedlik-SVC · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Amy Graff
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-2
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams54 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level9 levels played
3.5
70.8%
92W–38L · 59.3% of games
4.0
57.9%
66W–48L · 53.5% of games
4.5
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.5
100%
7W–0L · 70.3% of games
7.0
70%
7W–3L · 54.2% of games
7.5
61.5%
40W–25L · 55.9% of games
8.5
75%
15W–5L · 57% of games
7.0mixed
60.7%
17W–11L · 58.7% of games
8.0mixed
52.5%
21W–19L · 53.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 37% of the time
#1 Doubles
37%
155 matches
#2 Doubles
31%
128 matches
#3 Doubles
29%
121 matches
#2 Singles
1%
6 matches
#1 Singles
1%
3 matches
#4 Doubles
1%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Experience is a big word. I think it comes with time, and I have that.
Serena Williams