← Search

Dee Lamphear

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Ann Arbor, MI
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
223 matches · 158W–65L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history223 matches
W
2026-10-09 · LIB-Haessler 7.5W Weekend Combo F · #2 Doubles · with Ariel Wan
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 2-1
W
2026-07-09 · RCAA-Lamphear (doubles clay) 40s 4.0 NW F1 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Leslie Ehrman
loading the estimate
7-6, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-07-02 · RCAA-Lamphear (doubles clay) 40s 4.0 NW F1 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Leslie Ehrman
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-3
W
2026-07-01 · VTC-Cooper (indoor) 40s 4.0 DW F · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Wendy Langrock
loading the estimate
6-2, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-06-30 · AAREC-Kaufman 18s 4.0 NW F2 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Karen Hale
loading the estimate
1-6, 3-6
L
2026-06-29 · VTC-Cooper (indoor) 40s 4.0 DW F · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jean Wang
loading the estimate
4-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2026-06-25 · RCAA-Lamphear (doubles clay) 40s 4.0 NW F1 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Carrie Schmidt
loading the estimate
3-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
2026-06-23 · AAREC-Kaufman 18s 4.0 NW F2 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Karen Hale
loading the estimate
7-5, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-06-17 · VTC-Cooper (indoor) 40s 4.0 DW F · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Christine Lammers
loading the estimate
0-6, 4-6
L
2026-06-12 · LIB-Arthur 18s 8.0X F · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Dorran Dihle mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 4-6
L
2026-06-11 · RCAA-Lamphear (doubles clay) 40s 4.0 NW F1 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Pardip Bolina
loading the estimate
5-7, 1-6
W
2026-06-09 · AAREC-Kaufman 18s 4.0 NW F2 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Karen Hale
loading the estimate
6-2, 7-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams57 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level10 levels played
0.0
72.7%
8W–3L · 57.5% of games
2.5
100%
4W–0L · 66.7% of games
3.0
96.3%
26W–1L · 66.2% of games
3.5
78.7%
70W–19L · 59.5% of games
4.0
46.2%
18W–21L · 47.6% of games
6.5
80%
8W–2L · 58% of games
7.0
66.7%
4W–2L · 58.6% of games
7.5
62.5%
10W–6L · 55.4% of games
7.0mixed
52.9%
9W–8L · 56.4% of games
8.0mixed
0W–3L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 44% of the time
#1 Doubles
44%
97 matches
#2 Doubles
28%
63 matches
#3 Doubles
22%
48 matches
#4 Doubles
3%
6 matches
#2 Singles
2%
4 matches
#1 Singles
1%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to take the initiative and play your game. Confidence is just believing you can do it.
Chris Evert