← Search

Leslie Ehrman

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Ann Arbor, MI
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
207 matches · 136W–71L · seasons 2021–2026
Match history207 matches
L
2026-10-31 · HV-Wang 4.0W Fall Singles F · #3 Singles · 4.0
loading the estimate
1-6, 1-6
W
2026-10-24 · #2 Doubles · with Katherine Bauer
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-1
L
2026-10-17 · #2 Doubles · with Jeanne Cooper
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-7, 0-1
W
2026-10-16 · HV-Wang 4.0W Fall Singles F · #1 Singles · 4.0
loading the estimate
6-4, 7-6
W
2026-10-10 · #2 Doubles · with Elizabeth Levesque
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-08-11 · RCAA-Tucker 18s 8.0X F · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Christopher Peikert mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-4
W
2026-07-24 · HV-Bieniek 18s 7.0X F · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kunal Joshi mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-0
W
2026-07-14 · HV-Wang 18s 4.0 NW F2 · #1 Singles · 4.0
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-0
W
2026-07-10 · RCAA-Tucker 18s 8.0X F · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Michael Bambini mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-4
W
2026-07-09 · RCAA-Lamphear (doubles clay) 40s 4.0 NW F1 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Dee Lamphear
loading the estimate
7-6, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-07-08 · VTC-Cooper (indoor) 40s 4.0 DW F · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jeanne Cooper
loading the estimate
5-7, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-07-07 · HV-Wang 18s 4.0 NW F2 · #1 Singles · 4.0
loading the estimate
6-2, 7-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams67 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level13 levels played
0.0
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
3.0
77.8%
21W–6L · 64.1% of games
3.5
77.8%
56W–16L · 60.8% of games
4.0
52.8%
19W–17L · 52.8% of games
5.5
80%
4W–1L · 77.3% of games
6.0
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
6.5
62.5%
10W–6L · 61.2% of games
7.0
61.9%
13W–8L · 57.9% of games
7.5
28.6%
2W–5L · 49.6% of games
8.0
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
50%
3W–3L · 50.5% of games
8.0mixed
2W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 25% of the time
#1 Doubles
25%
52 matches
#2 Doubles
23%
48 matches
#1 Singles
20%
41 matches
#3 Doubles
15%
31 matches
#2 Singles
10%
20 matches
#4 Doubles
4%
8 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams