← Search

Jean Wang

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Ann Arbor, MI
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
243 matches · 142W–101L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history243 matches
L
2026-10-31 · HV-Wang 4.0W Fall Singles F · #2 Singles · 4.0
loading the estimate
2-3
L
2026-10-30 · #1 Doubles · with Stephanie Tharp
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 0-6
L
2026-10-16 · HV-Wang 4.0W Fall Singles F · #2 Singles · 4.0
loading the estimate
3-6, 3-3
L
2026-10-03 · HV-Wang 4.0W Fall Singles F · #2 Singles · 4.0
loading the estimate
2-6, 2-6
W
2026-10-02 · #3 Doubles · with Amy Gillett
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-1
W
2026-07-28 · RCAA-Tucker 18s 8.0X F · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Christopher Peikert mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-3
W
2026-07-14 · HV-Wang 18s 4.0 NW F2 · #2 Singles · 4.0
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-0
W
2026-07-10 · RCAA-Tucker 18s 8.0X F · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jeremy Taylor mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 7-5
W
2026-07-07 · HV-Wang 18s 4.0 NW F2 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Raquel Clasby
loading the estimate
6-0, 6-2
W
2026-07-02 · RCAA-Lamphear (doubles clay) 40s 4.0 NW F1 · #1 Singles · 4.0
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-3
W
2026-06-30 · HV-Wang 18s 4.0 NW F2 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Julie Ewy
loading the estimate
6-4, 2-3
L
2026-06-29 · VTC-Cooper (indoor) 40s 4.0 DW F · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Dee Lamphear
loading the estimate
4-6, 6-4, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams72 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level9 levels played
2.5
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
3.0
60.7%
17W–11L · 55.3% of games
3.5
68%
34W–16L · 61.1% of games
4.0
52.6%
50W–45L · 50.9% of games
7.0
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
7.5
50%
2W–2L · 50.6% of games
7.0mixed
66.7%
4W–2L · 55.8% of games
7.5mixed
75%
3W–1L · 56.1% of games
8.0mixed
42.9%
3W–4L · 48.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 25% of the time
#1 Doubles
25%
61 matches
#1 Singles
20%
49 matches
#2 Doubles
20%
49 matches
#2 Singles
17%
40 matches
#3 Doubles
12%
30 matches
Singles
3%
6 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I don’t want to be somebody else. I want to be myself and win in my way.
Rafael Nadal