← Search

Lisa Hutton

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Ann Arbor, MI
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
283 matches · 147W–136L · seasons 2018–2026
Match history283 matches
L
2026-10-25 · VTC-Watson 7.0 X 55&0 F · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Sean O'Brien mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 4-6
L
2026-10-24 · #1 Doubles · with Karen Hale
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 4-6
W
2026-10-23 · #1 Doubles · with Libby Hemphill
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-4
L
2026-10-02 · #3 Doubles · with Amelia Manley
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 1-6
W
2026-07-21 · HV-Watson 55s 7.0 NW F3 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Marci Walker
loading the estimate
7-6, 7-5
W
2026-07-20 · HV-Haessler 40s 3.5 NW F2 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Eva Bieniek
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-1
L
2026-07-16 · LIB-Yoshihar 55s 7.0 DW F1 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Wendy Boyle
loading the estimate
5-7, 2-6
W
2026-07-15 · LIB- Marley 18s 3.5 NW F1 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Stephanie Gensheimer
loading the estimate
6-1, 7-6
W
2026-07-14 · HV-Watson 55s 7.0 NW F3 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Marci Walker
loading the estimate
6-1, 5-7, 1-0
L
2026-07-13 · HV-Haessler 40s 3.5 NW F2 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Leslie ODonnell
loading the estimate
2-6, 3-6
L
2026-06-22 · HV-Haessler 40s 3.5 NW F2 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Leslie ODonnell
loading the estimate
5-7, 6-4, 0-1
W
2026-06-18 · VTC-Haessler (indoor) 18s 3.5 DW F1 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Zhen Edelman
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-3
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams84 teams · 2019–2026
HV-Haessler 40s 3.5 NW F2
2026 bSEM ADULT 40 & OVER NIGHT WOMEN · 3.5 WOMEN MON PM SEM · 40+
2026
HV-Watson 55s 7.0 NW F3
2026 bSEM ADULT 55 & OVER NIGHT WOMEN · 7.0 WOMEN TUES PM SEM · 55+
2026
LIB- Marley 18s 3.5 NW F1
2026 bSEM ADULT 18 & OVER NIGHT WOMEN · 3.5 WOMEN WED PM SEM · 18+
2026
LIB-Haessler 7.5W Weekend Combo F
2026 cSEM FALL COMBO DOUBLES · WOMEN 75 COMBO SEM
2026
LIB-Haessler LOW TRI DAY Women F
2026 aSEM TRI-LEVEL - WINTER · 2026 Tri-Level Jan Low 4.0 3.5 3.0 Women SEM
2026
LIB-Inoue 6.5W Weekend Combo F
2026 cSEM FALL COMBO DOUBLES · WOMEN 65 COMBO SEM
2026
LIB-Inoue 6.5W Weekend Combo F4
2026 cSEM FALL COMBO DOUBLES · WOMEN 65 COMBO SEM
2026
LIB-Inoue Entry Tri Women F
2026 aSEM TRI-LEVEL - WINTER · 2026 Tri-Level Jan Entry 3.5 3.0 2.5 Women SEM
2026
LIB-Katakowski 40&O 70 Mix F
2026 aSEM MIX WINTER 40 & OVER · 2026 70 MIXED 40 & OVER SEM F · 40+
2026
LIB-Marley 3.5W Fall Singles F
2026 cSEM FALL TEAM SINGLES · WOMEN 3.5 SINGLES SEM
2026
LIB-Marley 3.5W Fall Singles F1
2026 cSEM FALL TEAM SINGLES · WOMEN 3.5 SINGLES SEM
2026
LIB-Marley 35 WOMEN winter SINGLES F1
2026 aSEM WINTER TEAM SINGLES · 2026 WOMEN 3.5 WINTER SINGLES SEM
2026
LIB-Yoshihar 55s 7.0 DW F1
2026 bSEM ADULT 55 & OVER DAY WOMEN · 7.0 WOMEN THUR AM SEM · 55+
2026
VTC-Haessler (indoor) 18s 3.5 DW F1
2026 bSEM ADULT 18 & OVER DAY WOMEN · 3.5 WOMEN THURS AM SEM · 18+
2026
VTC-Haessler (indoor) 40s 3.5 DW F1
2026 bSEM ADULT 40 & OVER DAY WOMEN · 3.5 WOMEN TUES AM SEM · 40+
2026
VTC-Watson 7.0 X 55&0 F
2026 cSEM MIX FALL 55 & OVER · 55 & Over 7.0X · 55+
2026
holding 2026 NW 40+
2026 bSEM ADULT 40 & OVER NIGHT WOMEN · HOLDING 40 NW · 40+
2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level9 levels played
2.5
80%
4W–1L · 64.4% of games
3.0
63%
34W–20L · 54.4% of games
3.5
43.3%
58W–76L · 47.8% of games
5.5
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.0
35.7%
5W–9L · 43.7% of games
6.0mixed
42.9%
3W–4L · 47.2% of games
6.5mixed
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
50%
5W–5L · 49.2% of games
7.5mixed
1W–0L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 33% of the time
#1 Doubles
33%
92 matches
#2 Doubles
28%
80 matches
#3 Doubles
14%
41 matches
#1 Singles
7%
19 matches
#2 Singles
6%
17 matches
#3 Singles
6%
17 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova