Eva Bieniek
Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Ann Arbor, MI
143 matches · 76W–67L · seasons 2022–2026
Match history143 matches
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams39 teams · 2022–2026
BT-Watson Tri MED Women F
CHIP-Bausewein Entry Tri Women F
CHIP-Douglass 7.5 COMBO MIX
CHIP-Shaw 7.5W Weekend Combo F
HV-Bieniek 18s 7.0X F
HV-Bieniek 3.5W Fall Singles F
HV-Bieniek 3.5W Fall Singles F1
HV-Bieniek 35 WOMEN winter SINGLES F1
HV-Bieniek 40&O 70 Mix F
HV-Haessler 40s 3.5 NW F2
HV-Sober 18s 3.5 NW F1
HV-Watson 40s 4.0 NW F1
LIB-Inoue 6.5W Weekend Combo F
LIB-Inoue 6.5W Weekend Combo F4
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level11 levels played
3.0
64.3%
18W–10L · 56.8% of games
3.5
47.9%
23W–25L · 48.9% of games
4.0
75%
3W–1L · 56.6% of games
5.5
75%
3W–1L · 62.5% of games
6.0
100%
6W–0L · 72.2% of games
6.5
28.6%
2W–5L · 47.7% of games
7.0
71.4%
10W–4L · 53.9% of games
7.5
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
25%
1W–3L · 44.3% of games
7.0mixed
40%
6W–9L · 49.5% of games
7.5mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.
By lineusually #1 Doubles, 27% of the time
#1 Doubles
27%
39 matches
#1 Singles
21%
30 matches
#2 Doubles
17%
24 matches
#2 Singles
15%
21 matches
#3 Doubles
12%
17 matches
#4 Doubles
4%
6 matches
How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.
Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.
I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.