← Search

Chih Lin

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Ann Arbor, MI
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
261 matches · 148W–113L · seasons 2019–2026

USTA moved this player up a level mid-season in 2019. A published rating does not change until the end of the year, so the level shown above can be behind what USTA has already decided.

Match history261 matches
L
2026-10-03 · HV-Clarke 4.0M Fall Singles F · #1 Singles · 4.0
loading the estimate
3-6, 0-6
L
2026-08-31 · HV-Watson 7.5 COMBO MIX F · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Zhen Edelman mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 6-4, 0-1
L
2026-08-26 · HV-Watson 7.5 COMBO MIX F · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Tammy Watson mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 5-7, 0-1
L
2026-08-23 · HV-Brewer 40s 4.0M F1 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Noe Erasga championship
loading the estimate
2-6, 5-7
L
2026-08-22 · HV-Brewer 40s 4.0M F1 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Michael Bambini championship
loading the estimate
6-4, 4-6, 0-1
W
2026-08-21 · HV-Brewer 40s 4.0M F1 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with James Reid championship
loading the estimate
6-7, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-08-19 · HV-Watson 7.5 COMBO MIX F · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Christine Hume mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 2-6, 1-0
W
2026-08-17 · HV-Watson 7.5 COMBO MIX F · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Zhen Edelman mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-3
L
2026-08-11 · RCAA-Tucker 18s 8.0X F · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Kaitlyn Moore mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 2-6
L
2026-08-04 · RCAA-Tucker 18s 8.0X F · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Emily Bambini mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 1-6
W
2026-08-03 · HV-Watson 7.5 COMBO MIX F · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Elizabeth King mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-4
W
2026-08-01 · RCAA-Shaw 18s 4.0M F2 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Evan Ufer championship
loading the estimate
7-6, 6-2
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams66 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level13 levels played
0.0
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
3.0
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
3.5
67.6%
25W–12L · 56.5% of games
4.0
56%
47W–37L · 51.3% of games
6.5
85.7%
6W–1L · 65.9% of games
7.0
80%
4W–1L · 52.7% of games
7.5
55%
11W–9L · 57.1% of games
8.0
72.7%
8W–3L · 54.2% of games
8.5
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
57.6%
19W–14L · 54.5% of games
7.5mixed
50%
9W–9L · 51.8% of games
8.0mixed
35%
7W–13L · 47% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 35% of the time
#1 Doubles
35%
90 matches
#2 Doubles
27%
70 matches
#3 Doubles
23%
59 matches
#2 Singles
6%
16 matches
Singles
3%
9 matches
#3 Singles
3%
7 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams