← Search

Kaitlyn Moore

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Ann Arbor, MI
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
175 matches · 109W–66L · seasons 2022–2026
Match history175 matches
L
2026-10-24 · HV-Moore 3.5W Fall Singles F1 · #3 Singles · 3.5
loading the estimate
4-6, 1-3
L
2026-10-24 · #3 Doubles · with Michelle Famurewa
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
2026-10-10 · #2 Doubles · with Raquel Clasby
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 6-1, 1-0
W
2026-10-02 · HV-Moore 3.5W Fall Singles F1 · #2 Singles · 3.5
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-3
L
2026-08-11 · RCAA-Tucker 18s 8.0X F · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Chih Lin mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 2-6
W
2026-07-31 · RCAA-Moore 18s 6.0X F · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Todd Moore mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 6-2, 1-0
L
2026-07-28 · RCAA-Tucker 18s 8.0X F · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jeremy Taylor mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 3-6
W
2026-07-25 · HV-King 40s 3.5 NW F2 · #1 Singles · 3.5 championship
loading the estimate
7-6, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-07-13 · HV-King 40s 3.5 NW F2 · #1 Singles · 3.5
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-4
L
2026-07-10 · RCAA-Moore 18s 6.0X F · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Todd Moore mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 3-6
L
2026-07-09 · RCAA-Lamphear (doubles clay) 40s 4.0 NW F1 · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Cori Peng
loading the estimate
2-6, 6-2, 0-1
L
2026-07-08 · HV-Sober 18s 3.5 NW F1 · #2 Singles · 3.5
loading the estimate
3-6, 4-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams48 teams · 2022–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
2.5
30%
3W–7L · 46.2% of games
3.0
68.2%
45W–21L · 57.1% of games
3.5
71%
22W–9L · 58.2% of games
4.0
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
5.5
66.7%
4W–2L · 52.1% of games
6.0mixed
47.1%
8W–9L · 47.8% of games
6.5mixed
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 26% of the time
#2 Doubles
26%
46 matches
#1 Singles
21%
37 matches
#3 Doubles
18%
31 matches
#1 Doubles
15%
27 matches
#2 Singles
13%
22 matches
Singles
5%
8 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert