← Search

Nicole Banker

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Sylvania, OH
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
234 matches · 130W–104L · seasons 2021–2026
Match history234 matches
W
2026-11-01 · NWO 6.5W Combo Banker/Cody-TWOS · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Katie Williamson
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 4-2
L
2026-10-31 · NWO 7.5W Combo Bastas/Keating-TWOS · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Kate Keating
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 4-6
W
2026-10-25 · NWO 6.5W Combo Banker/Cody-TWOS · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Katie Williamson
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-4
L
2026-10-24 · NWO 7.5W Combo Bastas/Keating-TWOS · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Kurstyn Loeffler
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 1-2
W
2026-10-18 · NWO 6.5W Combo Banker/Cody-TWOS · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Erin Marciniak
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 2-1
L
2026-10-11 · NWO 6.5W Combo Banker/Cody-TWOS · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Erin Marciniak
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 3-6
L
2026-09-13 · NWO 18&Over 7.0MX Keating/Cody Twos · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Chad Cody mixed championship
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 5-7
L
2026-08-23 · NWO 40&Over 3.5W Walton/Nejedlik-SVC · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kelly Cody championship
loading the estimate
5-7, 4-6
L
2026-08-22 · NWO 40&Over 3.5W Walton/Nejedlik-SVC · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kelly Cody championship
loading the estimate
2-6, 1-6
L
2026-08-22 · NWO 40&Over 3.5W Walton/Nejedlik-SVC · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kelly Cody championship
loading the estimate
3-6, 3-6
W
2026-08-21 · NWO 40&Over 3.5W Walton/Nejedlik-SVC · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Rachel Mutchler championship
loading the estimate
6-0, 6-4
W
2026-08-07 · NWO 40&Over 3.5W Walton/Nejedlik-SVC · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kelly Cody championship
loading the estimate
6-0, 6-2
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams43 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level10 levels played
2.5
60%
12W–8L · 56.2% of games
3.0
63.6%
14W–8L · 55% of games
3.5
47.2%
34W–38L · 50.1% of games
4.0
37.5%
3W–5L · 46.5% of games
5.5
60%
12W–8L · 55.4% of games
6.5
70%
7W–3L · 53.6% of games
7.5
55.6%
5W–4L · 52.8% of games
6.0mixed
66.7%
16W–8L · 56.1% of games
7.0mixed
50%
15W–15L · 48% of games
8.0mixed
63.2%
12W–7L · 55.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 37% of the time
#1 Doubles
37%
87 matches
#2 Doubles
28%
66 matches
#3 Doubles
24%
56 matches
#4 Doubles
6%
13 matches
#1 Singles
3%
8 matches
#2 Singles
2%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Success is a journey, not a destination. The doing is often more important than the outcome.
Arthur Ashe