← Search

Chad Cody

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Sylvania, OH
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
200 matches · 100W–100L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history200 matches
L
2026-10-31 · NWO 7.5M Combo Berk- Launchpad · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Clayton Gifford
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 4-6
L
2026-10-25 · NWO 6.5M Combo Howard -TWOS · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Dennis Rife
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 2-6
W
2026-10-11 · NWO 6.5M Combo Howard -TWOS · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Eric Kielhorn
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-1
W
2026-09-27 · NWO 6.5M Combo Howard -TWOS · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Dennis Rife
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-1
L
2026-09-26 · NWO 7.5M Combo Berk- Launchpad · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Vincent Thepsourinthone
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 4-6, 0-1
L
2026-09-13 · NWO 18&Over 7.0MX Keating/Cody Twos · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Nicole Banker mixed championship
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 5-7
W
2026-07-09 · NWO 18&Over 3.5M Keating-TWOS · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Noah Rife
loading the estimate
6-0, 6-4
W
2026-07-06 · NWO 40&Over 3.5M Keating/Berk -TWOS- · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Thomas Blaine
loading the estimate
7-5, 7-5
L
2026-06-29 · NWO 40&Over 3.5M Keating/Berk -TWOS- · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Mike O'Reilly
loading the estimate
4-6, 2-6
W
2026-06-04 · NWO 18&Over 3.5M Keating-TWOS · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Noah Rife
loading the estimate
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-06-01 · NWO 40&Over 3.5M Keating/Berk -TWOS- · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Thomas Blaine
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-05-30 · NWO 18&Over 7.0MX Keating/Cody Twos · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kelly Cody mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 4-6, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams37 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
3.0
51.6%
16W–15L · 52.7% of games
3.5
50.8%
31W–30L · 48% of games
4.0
0%
0W–7L · 32.8% of games
6.5
58.7%
27W–19L · 52.6% of games
7.5
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
52.6%
10W–9L · 52.6% of games
7.0mixed
50%
15W–15L · 48.9% of games
8.0mixed
0W–3L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 42% of the time
#1 Doubles
42%
84 matches
#2 Doubles
32%
63 matches
#3 Doubles
22%
43 matches
#4 Doubles
3%
5 matches
#2 Singles
2%
4 matches
#1 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer