← Search

Clayton Gifford

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Sylvania, OH
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
264 matches · 154W–110L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history264 matches
L
2026-10-31 · NWO 7.5M Combo Berk- Launchpad · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Chad Cody
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 4-6
L
2026-10-27 · NWO 7.5M Combo Berk- Launchpad · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Jason Johnson
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 4-6, 0-1
W
2026-10-25 · NWO 6.5M Combo Tusing/Gifford-Launchpad · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Brett Mcdougle
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-3
W
2026-10-18 · NWO 6.5M Combo Tusing/Gifford-Launchpad · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Chad Greiner
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 7-5
W
2026-10-17 · NWO 7.5M Combo Berk- Launchpad · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with David Tusing
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 5-3, 1-0
W
2026-10-04 · NWO 6.5M Combo Tusing/Gifford-Launchpad · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Brett Mcdougle
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 6-4
W
2026-10-03 · NWO 7.5M Combo Berk- Launchpad · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Darin Freeman
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 5-2
L
2026-09-26 · NWO 7.5M Combo Berk- Launchpad · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with David Tusing
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 4-6
L
2026-08-09 · NWO 18&Over 4.0M Damschroder-Jermain · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Matt Damschroder championship
loading the estimate
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-08-08 · NWO 18&Over 4.0M Damschroder-Jermain · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Matt Damschroder championship
loading the estimate
1-6, 6-2, 0-1
W
2026-07-29 · NWO 40&Over 4.0M Berk -Jermain · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jordan Rofkar
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-07-28 · NWO 18&Over 4.0M Damschroder-Jermain · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Matt Damschroder
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-2
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams47 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level11 levels played
2.5
75%
6W–2L · 61.2% of games
3.0
64.3%
9W–5L · 47.7% of games
3.5
58.9%
33W–23L · 54.4% of games
4.0
56%
28W–22L · 52.9% of games
4.5
28.6%
2W–5L · 41.3% of games
6.5
66.1%
39W–20L · 53.6% of games
7.5
50%
10W–10L · 48% of games
8.5
28.6%
2W–5L · 44.5% of games
6.0mixed
66.7%
6W–3L · 53.3% of games
7.0mixed
58.1%
18W–13L · 53.4% of games
8.0mixed
1W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 39% of the time
#1 Doubles
39%
102 matches
#2 Doubles
33%
88 matches
#3 Doubles
23%
60 matches
#2 Singles
3%
9 matches
#4 Doubles
1%
3 matches
#1 Singles
1%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to believe in the long term plan you have but you need the short term goals to motivate and inspire you.
Roger Federer