← Search

Austin Kleman

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Bryan, OH
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
119 matches · 74W–45L · seasons 2016–2026
Match history119 matches
L
2026-07-28 · NWO 18&Over 4.0W Langenderfer/Harberson-TWOS · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with David Taylor
loading the estimate
1-6, 2-6
W
2026-07-21 · NWO 18&Over 4.0W Langenderfer/Harberson-TWOS · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Aaron Levine
loading the estimate
6-0, 6-3
W
2026-07-07 · NWO 18&Over 4.0W Langenderfer/Harberson-TWOS · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with David Taylor
loading the estimate
5-7, 6-2, 1-0
L
2026-06-28 · NWO 18&Over 4.0W Langenderfer/Harberson-TWOS · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Alan Harberson
loading the estimate
1-6, 3-6
L
2026-06-23 · NWO 18&Over 4.0W Langenderfer/Harberson-TWOS · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with William Estes
loading the estimate
6-7, 3-6
W
2026-06-09 · NWO 18&Over 4.0W Langenderfer/Harberson-TWOS · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with William Estes
loading the estimate
6-0, 6-1
W
2026-05-26 · NWO 18&Over 4.0W Langenderfer/Harberson-TWOS · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ty Langenderfer
loading the estimate
6-3, 7-6
W
2026-05-12 · NWO 18&Over 4.0W Langenderfer/Harberson-TWOS · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ty Langenderfer
loading the estimate
7-5, 6-1
L
2026-05-05 · NWO 18&Over 4.0W Langenderfer/Harberson-TWOS · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ty Langenderfer
loading the estimate
6-0, 1-6, 0-1
W
2025-07-22 · NWO 18&Over 4.0M Langenderfer/Harberson-TWOS · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with David Taylor
loading the estimate
7-5, 6-7, 1-0
W
2025-07-08 · NWO 18&Over 4.0M Langenderfer/Harberson-TWOS · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ty Langenderfer
loading the estimate
6-4, 7-6
L
2025-07-02 · NWO 18&Over 4.0M Langenderfer/Harberson-TWOS · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jeff Beeler
loading the estimate
5-7, 6-3, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams8 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
4.0
62.6%
72W–43L · 56.2% of games
8.0mixed
50%
2W–2L · 53.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 45% of the time
#1 Doubles
45%
53 matches
#2 Doubles
20%
24 matches
#2 Singles
18%
21 matches
#3 Doubles
13%
16 matches
#1 Singles
4%
5 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova