← Search

Jim Zaleski

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
WATERVILLE, OH
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
177 matches · 98W–79L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history177 matches
L
2026-10-25 · NWO 6.5M Combo Naus · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Roger Moungie
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 1-4
L
2026-10-04 · NWO 6.5M Combo Naus · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Alan Klink
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 4-6
L
2026-08-01 · NWO 18&Over 3.0M Moeller-TWOS · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Mike Kapuscinski championship
loading the estimate
4-6, 3-6
L
2026-08-01 · NWO 18&Over 3.0M Moeller-TWOS · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Mike Kapuscinski championship
loading the estimate
0-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
2026-07-21 · NWO 18&Over 3.0M Moeller-TWOS · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Mike Kapuscinski
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-1
L
2026-07-20 · NWO 40&Over 3.5M Drumm/Naus-BGSU · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Brent Cummings
loading the estimate
2-6, 0-6
W
Default
2026-07-14 · NWO 18&Over 3.0M Moeller-TWOS · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Mike Kapuscinski
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-07-13 · NWO 40&Over 3.5M Drumm/Naus-BGSU · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Brent Cummings
loading the estimate
1-6, 4-6
L
2026-06-23 · NWO 18&Over 3.0M Moeller-TWOS · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Cole Shaffer
loading the estimate
2-6, 5-7
W
2026-06-22 · NWO 40&Over 3.5M Drumm/Naus-BGSU · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Roger Moungie
loading the estimate
5-7, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-06-16 · NWO 18&Over 3.0M Moeller-TWOS · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Greg Davis
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-0
L
2026-06-15 · NWO 40&Over 3.5M Drumm/Naus-BGSU · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jason Naus
loading the estimate
6-7, 4-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams35 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.0
64.8%
57W–31L · 54.2% of games
3.5
25%
4W–12L · 37.7% of games
6.5
53.8%
14W–12L · 50.5% of games
7.0
28.6%
2W–5L · 45.5% of games
6.0mixed
54.1%
20W–17L · 51.1% of games
7.0mixed
1W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 27% of the time
#1 Doubles
27%
47 matches
#2 Doubles
24%
43 matches
#3 Doubles
23%
41 matches
#2 Singles
16%
29 matches
#1 Singles
7%
12 matches
#4 Doubles
3%
5 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to take the initiative and play your game. Confidence is just believing you can do it.
Chris Evert