← Search

Jason Johnson

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Toledo, OH
3.5C year-end 2024
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
131 matches · 77W–54L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history131 matches
L
2026-10-27 · NWO 7.5M Combo Berk- Launchpad · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Clayton Gifford
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 4-6, 0-1
L
2026-08-09 · NWO 18&Over 3.5M Tusing/Jacobs-Northview · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Adam Reinbolt championship
loading the estimate
6-7, 3-6
W
2026-08-08 · NWO 18&Over 3.5M Tusing/Jacobs-Northview · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Adam Reinbolt championship
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-7, 1-0
L
2026-08-07 · NWO 40&Over 3.5M Jacobs -Southview · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Adam Reinbolt championship
loading the estimate
4-6, 7-6, 0-1
L
2026-08-07 · NWO 40&Over 3.5M Jacobs -Southview · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Adam Reinbolt championship
loading the estimate
4-6, 0-6
L
2026-08-02 · NWO 40&Over 3.5M Jacobs -Southview · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Dan McCloskey championship
loading the estimate
4-6, 6-3, 0-1
W
2026-08-01 · NWO 18&Over 3.5M Tusing/Jacobs-Northview · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Adam Reinbolt championship
loading the estimate
6-4, 5-7, 1-0
L
2026-07-30 · NWO 18&Over 3.5M Tusing/Jacobs-Northview · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Dan McCloskey
loading the estimate
3-6, 3-6
W
2026-07-16 · NWO 18&Over 3.5M Tusing/Jacobs-Northview · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Dan McCloskey
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-1
L
2026-07-13 · NWO 40&Over 3.5M Jacobs -Southview · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kevin Green
loading the estimate
6-1, 3-6, 0-1
W
2026-06-22 · NWO 40&Over 3.5M Jacobs -Southview · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Dan McCloskey
loading the estimate
6-2, 5-7, 1-0
W
2026-06-11 · NWO 18&Over 3.5M Tusing/Jacobs-Northview · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Matt Wainscott
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams30 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
2.5
75%
3W–1L · 63.2% of games
3.0
0%
0W–6L · 32.7% of games
3.5
70.1%
54W–23L · 60.5% of games
4.0
28.6%
6W–15L · 37.2% of games
6.5
66.7%
8W–4L · 53.4% of games
7.5
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
62.5%
5W–3L · 45.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 31% of the time
#1 Doubles
31%
41 matches
#2 Doubles
23%
30 matches
#1 Singles
22%
29 matches
#3 Doubles
12%
16 matches
#2 Singles
12%
15 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams