← Search

Rod Bowe

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Perrysburg, OH
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
101 matches · 71W–30L · seasons 2021–2026
Match history101 matches
W
Default
2026-08-31 · NWO 55&Over 7.0MX O'Reilly-Twos · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Denise Sottek mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-08-10 · NWO 55&Over 7.0MX O'Reilly-Twos · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Shelly Gottschalk mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-07-29 · NWO 40&Over 4.0M Williamson/Swartzbeck PTC · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kyle Williamson
loading the estimate
3-6, 2-6
L
2026-07-20 · NWO 40&Over 3.5M Mattas/Barnett PTC · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tim Laird
loading the estimate
1-6, 6-2, 0-1
W
2026-07-15 · NWO 40&Over 4.0M Williamson/Swartzbeck PTC · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kyle Williamson
loading the estimate
4-6, 7-6, 1-0
W
2026-07-13 · NWO 40&Over 3.5M Mattas/Barnett PTC · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Rob Stewart
loading the estimate
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-06-17 · NWO 55&Over 7.0M Shaw/Radel-PTC · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Alan Klink
loading the estimate
6-0, 6-2
L
2026-06-15 · NWO 40&Over 3.5M Mattas/Barnett PTC · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tim Laird
loading the estimate
5-7, 7-6, 0-1
W
2026-06-08 · NWO 40&Over 3.5M Mattas/Barnett PTC · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kyle Williamson
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-0
L
2026-06-03 · NWO 40&Over 4.0M Williamson/Swartzbeck PTC · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Guillermo Perilla
loading the estimate
1-6, 4-6
W
2026-06-01 · NWO 40&Over 3.5M Mattas/Barnett PTC · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tim Laird
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-0
W
2026-05-11 · NWO 40&Over 3.5M Mattas/Barnett PTC · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with John Lane
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams27 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level10 levels played
2.5
71.4%
5W–2L · 55.7% of games
3.0
90%
9W–1L · 61.2% of games
3.5
79.3%
23W–6L · 60.6% of games
4.0
50%
4W–4L · 48.6% of games
6.5
25%
1W–3L · 40.9% of games
7.0
66.7%
6W–3L · 58.4% of games
7.5
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
85.7%
6W–1L · 63.5% of games
7.0mixed
68.2%
15W–7L · 58% of games
8.0mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 36% of the time
#1 Doubles
36%
36 matches
#2 Doubles
36%
36 matches
#3 Doubles
15%
15 matches
#1 Singles
12%
12 matches
#2 Singles
2%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert