← Search

Tim Laird

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Perrysburg, OH
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
151 matches · 88W–63L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history151 matches
L
2026-07-29 · NWO 40&Over 4.0M Williamson/Swartzbeck PTC · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Michael Barnett
loading the estimate
2-6, 7-6, 0-1
W
2026-07-22 · NWO 40&Over 4.0M Williamson/Swartzbeck PTC · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Gary Swartzbeck
loading the estimate
7-6, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-07-20 · NWO 40&Over 3.5M Mattas/Barnett PTC · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Rod Bowe
loading the estimate
1-6, 6-2, 0-1
L
2026-07-08 · NWO 40&Over 4.0M Williamson/Swartzbeck PTC · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Rick Busselle
loading the estimate
3-6, 3-6
W
2026-06-29 · NWO 40&Over 3.5M Mattas/Barnett PTC · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Rob Stewart
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-3
L
2026-06-17 · NWO 40&Over 4.0M Williamson/Swartzbeck PTC · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ryan Bannister
loading the estimate
6-3, 0-6, 0-1
L
2026-06-15 · NWO 40&Over 3.5M Mattas/Barnett PTC · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Rod Bowe
loading the estimate
5-7, 7-6, 0-1
W
2026-06-01 · NWO 40&Over 3.5M Mattas/Barnett PTC · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Rod Bowe
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-0
L
2026-05-20 · NWO 40&Over 4.0M Williamson/Swartzbeck PTC · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with David Creps
loading the estimate
3-6, 2-6
W
2026-05-18 · NWO 40&Over 3.5M Mattas/Barnett PTC · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kyle Williamson
loading the estimate
6-7, 7-5, 1-0
W
2026-05-13 · NWO 40&Over 4.0M Williamson/Swartzbeck PTC · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with S Davidson
loading the estimate
6-0, 2-6, 1-0
L
2025-08-21 · NWO 55&Over 8.0M Creps/Stegman-PTC · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Douglas Shaffer
loading the estimate
6-4, 2-6, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams29 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
3.5
61.4%
35W–22L · 55.6% of games
4.0
33.3%
2W–4L · 41.4% of games
6.5
73.2%
30W–11L · 60.9% of games
7.5
25%
2W–6L · 38.2% of games
8.0
16.7%
1W–5L · 32.7% of games
6.0mixed
71.4%
5W–2L · 57.7% of games
7.0mixed
50%
10W–10L · 53.6% of games
8.0mixed
50%
3W–3L · 49.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 42% of the time
#1 Doubles
42%
63 matches
#2 Doubles
31%
47 matches
#3 Doubles
27%
41 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova