← Search

Ryan Bannister

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Perrysburg, OH
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
76 matches · 35W–41L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history76 matches
L
2026-07-22 · NWO 40&Over 4.0M Williamson/Swartzbeck PTC · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Michael Ferrell
loading the estimate
0-6, 0-6
L
2026-06-17 · NWO 40&Over 4.0M Williamson/Swartzbeck PTC · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Tim Laird
loading the estimate
6-3, 0-6, 0-1
L
2026-06-03 · NWO 40&Over 4.0M Williamson/Swartzbeck PTC · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Michael Barnett
loading the estimate
4-6, 3-6
L
2026-05-13 · NWO 40&Over 4.0M Williamson/Swartzbeck PTC · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Rick Busselle
loading the estimate
6-7, 4-6
L
2025-08-14 · NWO 55&Over 8.0M Creps/Stegman-PTC · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Robert Horn
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
4-6, 2-6
L
2025-08-07 · NWO 55&Over 8.0M Creps/Stegman-PTC · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Gary Swartzbeck
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
1-6, 3-6
L
2025-07-24 · NWO 55&Over 8.0M Creps/Stegman-PTC · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Tim Laird
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
0-6, 1-6
W
2024-07-22 · NWO 40&Over 3.5M Mattas/Barnett-PTC · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tim Laird
loading the estimate
1-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
2024-07-17 · NWO 40&Over 4.0M Busselle/Eilert-PTC · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Robert Seiffert
loading the estimate
6-0, 6-2
L
2024-07-15 · NWO 40&Over 3.5M Mattas/Barnett-PTC · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Daniel Beitzel
loading the estimate
3-6, 7-5, 0-1
W
2024-07-10 · NWO 40&Over 4.0M Busselle/Eilert-PTC · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Tyson Moore
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-2
W
2024-07-08 · NWO 40&Over 3.5M Mattas/Barnett-PTC · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tim Laird
loading the estimate
4-6, 6-4, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams13 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.5
53.8%
21W–18L · 52.4% of games
4.0
45.5%
5W–6L · 50.8% of games
6.5
57.1%
4W–3L · 65.2% of games
7.5
25%
2W–6L · 41.3% of games
8.0
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
37.5%
3W–5L · 50.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 26% of the time
#1 Doubles
26%
20 matches
#3 Doubles
26%
20 matches
#2 Doubles
18%
14 matches
#1 Singles
13%
10 matches
#2 Singles
11%
8 matches
#4 Doubles
5%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I don’t want to be somebody else. I want to be myself and win in my way.
Rafael Nadal