← Search

Robert Horn

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Bowling Green, OH
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
214 matches · 118W–96L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history214 matches
L
2026-02-15 · NWO Tri Level Men Swick-TWOS · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Noah Rife
loading the estimate
5-7, 1-6
L
2026-02-01 · NWO Tri Level Men Swick-TWOS · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Ty Langenderfer
loading the estimate
2-6, 4-6
L
2025-08-27 · NWO 55&Over 7.0M O’Reilly-Southview · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Bob Kolvey
loading the estimate
2-6, 2-6
L
2025-08-21 · NWO 55&Over 8.0M Creps/Stegman-PTC · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Rick Busselle
loading the estimate
6-3, 2-6, 0-1
L
2025-08-14 · NWO 55&Over 8.0M Creps/Stegman-PTC · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Ryan Bannister
loading the estimate
4-6, 2-6
W
2025-08-14 · NWO 55&Over 7.0M O’Reilly-Southview · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Norbert Trojanowski
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-0
L
2025-08-07 · NWO 55&Over 8.0M Creps/Stegman-PTC · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with David Creps
loading the estimate
1-6, 4-6
L
2025-07-31 · NWO 55&Over 8.0M Creps/Stegman-PTC · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Daniel Klein
loading the estimate
2-6, 2-6
W
2025-07-30 · NWO 55&Over 7.0M O’Reilly-Southview · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Bob Kolvey
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-1
L
2025-07-26 · NWO 40&Over 4.0M O’Reilly-Southview · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jess Bringolf
loading the estimate
3-6, 3-6
L
2025-07-25 · NWO 40&Over 4.0M O’Reilly-Southview · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jason Peisley
loading the estimate
7-6, 0-6, 0-1
W
2025-07-09 · NWO 55&Over 7.0M O’Reilly-Southview · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Bob Kolvey
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-4
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams34 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level10 levels played
2.5
66.7%
4W–2L · 55.1% of games
3.0
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
3.5
80.8%
42W–10L · 62.2% of games
4.0
40.5%
32W–47L · 44.9% of games
7.0
80%
4W–1L · 60.2% of games
7.5
72.2%
13W–5L · 59.7% of games
8.0
0%
0W–6L · 36.8% of games
8.5
16.7%
1W–5L · 42.2% of games
7.0mixed
54.2%
13W–11L · 49.7% of games
8.0mixed
56.2%
9W–7L · 52.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 32% of the time
#1 Doubles
32%
69 matches
#2 Doubles
24%
52 matches
#3 Doubles
24%
52 matches
#1 Singles
11%
24 matches
#2 Singles
8%
16 matches
#4 Doubles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Start where you are. Use what you have. Do what you can.
Arthur Ashe