Jeffrey Judis
Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Ottawa Hills, OH
139 matches · 105W–34L · seasons 2019–2025
Match history139 matches
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams49 teams · 2019–2025
NWO 18&Over 3.5M Estes/Stevens-Inverness
NWO 18&Over 7.0MX Bloomquist-
NWO 18&Over 8.0 MX Szczechowski
NWO 40&Over 3.5M Brooks/Hejeebu-SVC
NWO 40&Over 7.0MX Naus/Bloomquist
NWO 55&Over 7.0 MCCLOSKEY-SVC
NWO Combo 6.5M Jacobs
NWO Combo 7.5M O’Reilly/Sudershan-TWOS
NWO 18&Over 3.5M Jacobs -Northview HS
NWO 18&Over 7.0 Mixed Naus/Bloomquist
NWO 18&Over 8.0 Mixed Szczechowski
NWO 40&Over 3.5M McCloskey- SVC
NWO 40&Over 7.0 Mixed Naus/Bloomquist
NWO 55&Over 7.0M MCCLOSKEY-SVC
NWO Combo 6.5M Jacobs
NWO TRI-LEVEL MEN Deuce Thornton-SVC
NWO 18&Over 3.5M Jacobs-Springfield HS
NWO 18&Over 7.0 Mixed Naus/Bloomquist
NWO 18&Over 8.0Mx Szczechowski-SVC
NWO 40&Over 3.5M McCloskey- SVC
NWO 40&Over 7.0 Mixed Naus/Bloomquist
NWO 40&Over 8.0 Mixed Szczechowski-SVC
NWO 55&Over 7.0M Mccloskey-SVC
NWO Combo 6.5M Jacobs
NWO 18&Over 3.5 Men Jacobs Springfield HS
NWO 18&Over 7.0 Mx Bloomquist/Naus
NWO 18&Over 8.0Mx Szczechowski-SVC
NWO 40&Over 3.5 Men Mccloskey/Forster-SVC
NWO 40&Over 7.0Mx Bloomquist/Naus
NWO 40&Over 8.0Mx Walton- SVC
NWO 55&Over 7.0 Men Forster/McCloskey SVC
NWO 6.5M Combo Jacobs -SVC
40&Over 7.0 Mixed Bloomquist/Naus
40&Over 8.0 Mixed Sanderson-SVC
NWO 18&Over 3.5M Safadi -SVC
NWO 18&Over 7.0 Mixed Naus/Bloomquist
NWO 18&Over 8.0 Mixed Sanderson-SVC
NWO 40&Over 3.5M Forster/McCloskey -SVC
NWO 55&Over 7.0M Forster/McCloskey-SVC
NWO 18&Over 3.5M Safadi -SVC
NWO 18&Over 7.0MX Bloomquist/Naus
NWO 18&Over 8.0MX Sanderson -SVC
NWO 40&Over 3.5 Forster-SVC
NWO 55&Over 7.0M Safadi -SVC
NWO 18&Over 3.5M Safadi-SVC
NWO 18&Over 4.0M Malinowski/Stalker -UT
NWO 18&Over 8.0MX Sanderson -SVC
NWO 40&Over 3.5 M Forster/McCloskey SVC
NWO 40&Over 8.0MX Sanderson -SVC
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
2.5
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
3.5
87.1%
54W–8L · 65.9% of games
4.0
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
6.5
50%
2W–2L · 53.8% of games
7.0
90.5%
19W–2L · 70.9% of games
7.5
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
57.1%
12W–9L · 55.1% of games
8.0mixed
45.8%
11W–13L · 49.8% of games
Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.
By lineusually #1 Doubles, 42% of the time
#1 Doubles
42%
59 matches
#2 Doubles
34%
47 matches
#3 Doubles
22%
30 matches
#2 Singles
1%
2 matches
#1 Singles
1%
1 match
How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.
Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.
Experience is a big word. I think it comes with time, and I have that.