← Search

Darin Freeman

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Toledo, OH
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
281 matches · 159W–122L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history281 matches
W
2026-10-31 · NWO 7.5M Combo Berk- Launchpad · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Brian Espin
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-3
L
2026-10-27 · NWO 7.5M Combo Berk- Launchpad · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Vincent Thepsourinthone
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 4-6
W
2026-10-17 · NWO 7.5M Combo Berk- Launchpad · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Vincent Thepsourinthone
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 2-4, 1-0
W
2026-10-03 · NWO 7.5M Combo Berk- Launchpad · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Clayton Gifford
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 5-2
L
2026-09-26 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Mike Williams championship
loading the estimate
4-6, 1-6
L
2026-09-20 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Mike Williams championship
loading the estimate
3-6, 6-2, 0-1
W
2026-09-03 · NWO 55&Over 7.0MX Jacobs-SVC · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Elizabeth Moulton mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-1
W
2026-08-26 · NWO 55&Over 7.0M O’Reilly-Southview · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Mike Williams
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-1
L
2026-08-17 · NWO 55&Over 7.0MX Jacobs-SVC · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Marcie Cousino mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 3-6
W
2026-08-10 · NWO 55&Over 7.0MX Jacobs-SVC · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Rebecca Chen mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-2
L
2026-08-07 · NWO 40&Over 3.5M Jacobs -Southview · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Clinton Sowah championship
loading the estimate
2-6, 2-6
W
2026-08-07 · NWO 40&Over 3.5M Jacobs -Southview · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Steve Nixon championship
loading the estimate
1-6, 6-4, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams55 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level9 levels played
2.5
18.2%
2W–9L · 43.3% of games
3.5
70.8%
68W–28L · 57.3% of games
4.0
28.6%
6W–15L · 44.1% of games
6.5
48.3%
14W–15L · 49.4% of games
7.0
72.7%
8W–3L · 61.1% of games
7.5
81.8%
9W–2L · 56.7% of games
6.0mixed
66.7%
8W–4L · 59.2% of games
7.0mixed
50%
36W–36L · 50.9% of games
8.0mixed
44.4%
8W–10L · 49.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 34% of the time
#2 Doubles
34%
94 matches
#3 Doubles
30%
84 matches
#1 Doubles
24%
66 matches
#2 Singles
5%
14 matches
#4 Doubles
5%
13 matches
#1 Singles
4%
10 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer