← Search

Rachel Mutchler

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Toledo, OH
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
99 matches · 77W–22L · seasons 2024–2026
Match history99 matches
L
2026-11-01 · NWO 6.5W Combo Banker/Cody-TWOS · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Erin Marciniak
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 3-5, 0-1
L
2026-10-11 · NWO 6.5W Combo Banker/Cody-TWOS · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Kaitlin Kochendoerfer
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 1-6
W
2026-10-04 · NWO 6.5W Combo Banker/Cody-TWOS · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Erin Marciniak
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 5-1
W
2026-09-19 · NWO 40&Over 7.0MX O’Reilly-TWOS · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Ajay Padhye mixed championship
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-3
W
2026-09-19 · NWO 40&Over 7.0MX O’Reilly-TWOS · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Ajay Padhye mixed championship
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-2
W
2026-09-13 · NWO 18&Over 7.0MX Jacobs/Walton -SVC · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Ajay Padhye mixed championship
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 7-5
L
2026-09-13 · NWO 18&Over 7.0MX Jacobs/Walton -SVC · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Ajay Padhye mixed championship
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 3-6
W
2026-09-12 · NWO 40&Over 7.0MX O’Reilly-TWOS · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Ajay Padhye mixed championship
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 7-5
W
2026-09-12 · NWO 40&Over 7.0MX O’Reilly-TWOS · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Ajay Padhye mixed championship
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-08-23 · NWO 40&Over 3.5W Walton/Nejedlik-SVC · #1 Singles · 3.5 championship
loading the estimate
7-6, 6-0
W
2026-08-21 · NWO 40&Over 3.5W Walton/Nejedlik-SVC · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Nicole Banker championship
loading the estimate
6-0, 6-4
W
2026-08-07 · NWO 40&Over 3.5W Walton/Nejedlik-SVC · #1 Singles · 3.5 championship
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-4
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams20 teams · 2024–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
2.5
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
3.0
73.3%
11W–4L · 60.3% of games
3.5
76.7%
23W–7L · 65.2% of games
6.5
55.6%
5W–4L · 58% of games
7.5
0%
0W–4L · 36.4% of games
6.0mixed
93.3%
14W–1L · 66.8% of games
7.0mixed
95.2%
20W–1L · 67.6% of games
8.0mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 29% of the time
#1 Doubles
29%
29 matches
#1 Singles
23%
23 matches
#2 Doubles
22%
22 matches
#3 Doubles
22%
22 matches
#2 Singles
3%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer