← Search

Carrie McKee

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Findlay, OH
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
243 matches · 161W–82L · seasons 2021–2026
Match history243 matches
W
2026-11-01 · NWO 6.5W Combo McKee-Findlay · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Jane Bohnlein
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 5-3, 1-0
W
2026-10-27 · NWO 6,5W Combo Tues Williams/McKee-Findlay · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Kara Klink
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 4-5, 1-0
W
2026-10-25 · NWO 6.5W Combo McKee-Findlay · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Kara Klink
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-3
W
2026-10-24 · NWO 7.5W Combo McKee-Findlay · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Abby Wilson
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-2
W
2026-10-20 · NWO 6,5W Combo Tues Williams/McKee-Findlay · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Jane Bohnlein
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 4-5, 1-0
L
2026-10-18 · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Lindsay Williams championship
loading the estimate
7-5, 2-6, 0-1
L
2026-10-11 · NWO 8.5W Combo Abell-Findlay · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Abbie-Jade Campbell
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 4-6
W
2026-10-06 · NWO 6,5W Combo Tues Williams/McKee-Findlay · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Jane Bohnlein
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 4-2, 1-0
W
2026-09-27 · NWO 6.5W Combo McKee-Findlay · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Kara Klink
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-3
W
2026-09-26 · NWO 7.5W Combo McKee-Findlay · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Abby Wilson
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-09-12 · NWO 18&Over 4.0W McKee-U of F · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jennifer Burns championship
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-4
L
2026-07-27 · NWO 40&Over 3.5W McKee-U of F · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Canan Myers
loading the estimate
5-7, 4-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams39 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level10 levels played
2.5
60%
3W–2L · 56% of games
3.0
82.6%
38W–8L · 65.8% of games
3.5
69.7%
46W–20L · 57.9% of games
4.0
8.3%
1W–11L · 40.3% of games
5.5
57.1%
8W–6L · 53.2% of games
6.5
71.1%
32W–13L · 58.8% of games
7.5
80%
8W–2L · 63.2% of games
8.5
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
63.3%
19W–11L · 56.4% of games
7.0mixed
54.5%
6W–5L · 50.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 33% of the time
#1 Doubles
33%
79 matches
#2 Doubles
31%
74 matches
#3 Doubles
23%
56 matches
#1 Singles
10%
23 matches
#2 Singles
2%
5 matches
#4 Doubles
1%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert