← Search

Iuliana Nita

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Akron, OH
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
257 matches · 173W–84L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history257 matches
L
2026-10-30 · C 7.5W PM Nita · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Alison Baranek
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 0-6
W
2026-10-30 · FD 7.0 PM Nita · #1 Female Doubles · 7.0 · with Alison Baranek
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-1
W
2026-10-25 · C 7.5W PM Nita · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Camelia Clarke
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-1
W
2026-10-24 · C 7.5W PM Nita · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Alison Baranek
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-3
W
2026-10-23 · FD 7.0 PM Nita · #1 Female Doubles · 7.0 · with Alison Baranek
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-10-18 · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Lauren Thomas championship
loading the estimate
5-7, 6-2, 1-0
W
2026-10-18 · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Lauren Thomas championship
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-3
L
2026-10-15 · FD 7.0 PM Nita · #1 Female Doubles · 7.0 · with Alison Baranek
loading the estimate
2-6, 6-7
L
2026-10-10 · FD 7.0 PM Nita · #1 Female Doubles · 7.0 · with Lisa Consilio
loading the estimate
5-7, 2-6
L
2026-10-04 · C 7.5W PM Nita · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Camelia Clarke
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 2-6, 0-1
W
2026-10-02 · FD 7.0 PM Nita · #1 Female Doubles · 7.0 · with Alison Baranek
loading the estimate
7-5, 7-5
L
2026-09-27 · C 7.5W PM Nita · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Laura Ferguson
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 4-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams56 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level9 levels played
2.5
88.9%
8W–1L · 60% of games
3.0
76.3%
45W–14L · 61.5% of games
3.5
61.4%
43W–27L · 54.6% of games
4.0
50%
4W–4L · 45.5% of games
6.5
45.5%
10W–12L · 49.1% of games
7.0
71.4%
5W–2L · 57.2% of games
7.5
33.3%
2W–4L · 43.1% of games
6.0mixed
86.2%
25W–4L · 61.7% of games
7.0mixed
50%
12W–12L · 48.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 42% of the time
#1 Doubles
42%
109 matches
#2 Doubles
21%
55 matches
#1 Singles
9%
23 matches
Singles
9%
23 matches
#3 Doubles
9%
22 matches
#2 Singles
4%
10 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to believe in the long term plan you have but you need the short term goals to motivate and inspire you.
Roger Federer