← Search

Lisa Consilio

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Copley, OH
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
251 matches · 126W–125L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history251 matches
W
2026-10-30 · CX 6.5 TP1 Derrig · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with John Consilio mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-3
L
2026-10-10 · FD 7.0 2 PM Nita · #1 Female Doubles · 7.0 · with Iuliana Nita
loading the estimate
5-7, 2-6
L
2026-10-09 · C 7.5W PM Nita · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Caroline Evans
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 2-6
W
2026-09-27 · C 7.5W PM Nita · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Caroline Evans
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 6-4
W
2026-09-18 · CX 6.5 TP1 Derrig · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Ben Vasunia mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 7-6
W
2026-08-07 · A40 3.0W CC Stoica · #4 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kimberly Dickason championship
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-2
L
2026-08-07 · A40 3.0W CC Stoica · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kimberly Dickason championship
loading the estimate
6-2, 2-6, 0-1
W
2026-07-26 · A40 3.0W CC Stoica · #4 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kimberly Dickason championship
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-3
W
2026-07-25 · A40 3.0W CC Stoica · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kimberly Dickason championship
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-3
L
2026-07-20 · A40 3.0W CC Stoica · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kimberly Dickason championship
loading the estimate
4-6, 6-2, 0-1
W
2026-07-15 · A18 3.0W TP2 Sidell · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Nancy Sidell
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-3
L
2026-07-14 · A40 3.5W PM3 Whitlam · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sandra Tiernay
loading the estimate
3-6, 0-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams80 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level11 levels played
2.5
55.6%
5W–4L · 50.6% of games
3.0
58%
58W–42L · 53% of games
3.5
23.1%
6W–20L · 37.1% of games
5.5
36.4%
8W–14L · 46.3% of games
6.5
50%
8W–8L · 47.9% of games
7.0
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.5
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
5.0mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
60.4%
32W–21L · 53.2% of games
6.5mixed
50%
2W–2L · 50.6% of games
7.0mixed
35.3%
6W–11L · 42.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 35% of the time
#2 Doubles
35%
88 matches
#3 Doubles
29%
73 matches
#1 Doubles
21%
53 matches
#4 Doubles
9%
23 matches
#2 Singles
3%
7 matches
#1 Singles
2%
6 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Losing is not my enemy. Fear of losing is my enemy.
Rafael Nadal