← Search

Jacob Rabenhorst

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Bowling Green, OH
4.0C year-end 2023
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
55 matches · 36W–19L · seasons 2017–2026
Match history55 matches
L
2026-10-31 · NWO 7.5M Combo Uribes-Launchpad · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Gary Swartzbeck
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 6-3, 0-1
L
2026-10-25 · NWO 8.5M Combo Gold/Horvath · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Charles Horvath
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 6-7
W
2026-10-24 · NWO 7.5M Combo Uribes-Launchpad · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Jackson LaPointe
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 1-6, 1-0
W
2026-10-18 · NWO 8.5M Combo Gold/Horvath · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Charles Horvath
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-10-10 · NWO 7.5M Combo Uribes-Launchpad · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Charles Estes
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 2-0
W
2026-10-04 · NWO 8.5M Combo Gold/Horvath · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with John Kidd
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 7-5
W
2026-09-26 · NWO 7.5M Combo Uribes-Launchpad · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with SCOTT BOURBEAU
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 1-2, 1-0
W
2026-09-13 · NWO 18&Over 8.0MX Damschroder-Launchpad · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Marissa Patino mixed championship
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
2026-07-28 · NWO 18&Over 4.0M Damschroder-Jermain · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ali Merhi
loading the estimate
6-3, 7-6
L
2026-07-21 · NWO 18&Over 4.0M Damschroder-Jermain · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Braden Tucker
loading the estimate
6-3, 3-6, 0-1
W
2026-07-14 · NWO 18&Over 4.0M Damschroder-Jermain · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Braden Tucker
loading the estimate
6-0, 6-2
W
2026-06-30 · NWO 18&Over 4.0M Damschroder-Jermain · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Caleb Bundy
loading the estimate
6-1, 7-5
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams12 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
2.5
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
3.0
40%
2W–3L · 45.8% of games
4.0
90.9%
10W–1L · 64.8% of games
4.5
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.5
75%
3W–1L · 52.9% of games
8.5
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
66.7%
8W–4L · 57.9% of games
8.0mixed
85.7%
6W–1L · 57.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 40% of the time
#2 Doubles
40%
22 matches
#1 Doubles
38%
21 matches
Singles
14%
8 matches
#3 Doubles
7%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The mark of great sportsmen is not how good they are at their best, but how good they are at their worst.
Martina Navratilova