← Search

Kim Baslock

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Rochester Hills, MI
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
265 matches · 177W–88L · seasons 2018–2026
Match history265 matches
W
2026-10-31 · TROY-Hughes 7.5W Weekend Combo F · #1 Doubles · with Sara Van Wormer
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 6-1, 1-0
W
2026-08-31 · WESS-Baslock 7.5 COMBO MIX · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Donald Ponder mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 6-3
L
2026-08-24 · WESS-Baslock 7.5 COMBO MIX · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Brad Stieber mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 6-7
W
2026-08-12 · WESS-Baslock 7.5 COMBO MIX · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Michael Fleischer mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-4
L
2026-08-05 · WESS-Baslock 7.5 COMBO MIX · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Brad Stieber mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 6-3, 0-1
W
2026-08-03 · WESS-Baslock 7.5 COMBO MIX · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Robert Vondell mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 7-5
W
2026-07-31 · WESS-Palarz 18s 8.0X F · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Joel Ewald mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-07-31 · WESS-Li 18s 4.0 NW F1 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Anne-charlotte Stern championship
loading the estimate
2-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
2026-07-31 · WESS-Li 18s 4.0 NW F1 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Tara Sengupta championship
loading the estimate
6-1, 1-6, 1-0
L
2026-07-23 · TROY-Jackson 40s 4.0 NW F3 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with AnnMarie DeVito
loading the estimate
1-6, 3-6
L
2026-07-17 · WESS-Palarz 18s 8.0X F · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Victor Verma mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 1-6
W
2026-07-14 · WESS-Li 18s 4.0 NW F1 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Elizabeth Smagala
loading the estimate
4-6, 6-1, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams61 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level13 levels played
0.0
100%
6W–0L · 68.5% of games
3.0
88.9%
8W–1L · 72.6% of games
3.5
78.2%
43W–12L · 59.9% of games
4.0
52.7%
29W–26L · 49.7% of games
6.0
100%
6W–0L · 79.1% of games
6.5
82.1%
23W–5L · 68.5% of games
7.5
54.5%
6W–5L · 53% of games
8.0
0%
0W–6L · 38.5% of games
8.5
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
69.2%
9W–4L · 65% of games
7.0mixed
56.4%
22W–17L · 54.6% of games
7.5mixed
60%
3W–2L · 55% of games
8.0mixed
85.7%
6W–1L · 54.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 56% of the time
#1 Doubles
56%
147 matches
#2 Doubles
20%
53 matches
#3 Doubles
9%
25 matches
#1 Singles
6%
16 matches
#2 Singles
4%
10 matches
#3 Singles
2%
6 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to believe in the long term plan you have but you need the short term goals to motivate and inspire you.
Roger Federer