← Search

Cheryl Lau

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Beverly Hills, MI
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
287 matches · 154W–133L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history287 matches
L
2026-10-29 · FAC-Lau 7.5W Thurs Day Combo F · #3 Doubles · with Heather Erickson
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 0-6, 0-1
L
2026-10-08 · FAC-Lau 7.5W Thurs Day Combo F · #3 Doubles · with Samantha Ruma
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 6-0, 0-1
W
2026-07-23 · FAC-Steiner 40s 4.0 NW F3 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Meredith Tipton
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-3
W
2026-07-21 · FAC-Diamond 55s 7.0 NW F3 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Betsy Hollander
loading the estimate
6-1, 5-7, 1-0
W
2026-07-20 · FAC- Brandt 18s 4.0 DW F · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Meredith Tipton
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-2
W
2026-07-16 · FAC-Steiner 40s 4.0 NW F3 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Meredith Tipton
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-07-14 · FAC-Diamond 55s 7.0 NW F3 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Randi Long
loading the estimate
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-07-13 · FAC- Brandt 18s 4.0 DW F · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jamie Blank
loading the estimate
3-6, 4-6
W
2026-07-09 · FAC-Steiner 40s 4.0 NW F3 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Julie Short
loading the estimate
6-0, 7-5
W
2026-07-07 · FAC-Steiner 18s 4.0 NW F1 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Huiping Chen
loading the estimate
5-7, 6-1, 1-0
L
2026-06-18 · FAC-Steiner 40s 4.0 NW F3 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Nury Steiner
loading the estimate
5-7, 6-7
L
2026-06-16 · FAC-Diamond 55s 7.0 NW F3 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Betsy Hollander
loading the estimate
2-6, 6-2, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams73 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level10 levels played
3.0
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
3.5
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
4.0
57.1%
60W–45L · 52.9% of games
4.5
0%
0W–4L · 35.1% of games
7.0
57.1%
8W–6L · 54.5% of games
7.5
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
8.0
51.9%
28W–26L · 48.4% of games
7.0mixed
50%
11W–11L · 47% of games
8.0mixed
57.9%
11W–8L · 53.5% of games
9.0mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 38% of the time
#1 Doubles
38%
109 matches
#2 Doubles
36%
103 matches
#3 Doubles
25%
71 matches
#1 Singles
0%
1 match
#2 Singles
0%
1 match
#3 Singles
0%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer