← Search

Joel Ewald

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Pontiac, MI
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
209 matches · 87W–122L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history209 matches
W
2026-07-31 · WESS-Palarz 18s 8.0X F · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Kim Baslock mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-07-22 · WESS-Ewald 18s 4.0M F3 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with James Salk
loading the estimate
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-07-09 · WESS-Ewald 40s 4.0M F2 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Joshua Ewald
loading the estimate
1-6, 1-6
L
2026-06-25 · WESS-Ewald 40s 4.0M F2 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Erik Gomane
loading the estimate
4-6, 2-6
L
2026-06-23 · WESS-Ewald 18s 4.0M F3 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Oleg Pojidaev
loading the estimate
0-6, 4-6
L
2026-06-16 · WESS-Ewald 18s 4.0M F3 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Eric Rymkiewicz
loading the estimate
1-6, 4-6
W
2026-06-12 · WESS-Palarz 18s 8.0X F · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Kim Baslock mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 0-6, 1-0
L
2026-06-11 · WESS-Ewald 40s 4.0M F2 · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Joshua Ewald
loading the estimate
1-6, 5-7
L
2026-06-09 · WESS-Ewald 18s 4.0M F3 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Eric Rymkiewicz
loading the estimate
3-6, 2-6
L
2026-06-04 · WESS-Ewald 40s 4.0M F2 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Joshua Ewald
loading the estimate
1-6, 2-6
W
2026-05-30 · WESS-Palarz 18s 8.0X F · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Agnieszka Palarz mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-05-26 · WESS-Ewald 18s 4.0M F3 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jay Dalal
loading the estimate
4-6, 7-5, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams51 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level10 levels played
0.0
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
3.5
54.1%
20W–17L · 50.3% of games
4.0
16.1%
10W–52L · 36.7% of games
6.5
75%
6W–2L · 56.8% of games
7.0
75%
9W–3L · 63.2% of games
7.5
40%
4W–6L · 46.5% of games
8.0
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
75%
6W–2L · 64.1% of games
7.0mixed
50.9%
28W–27L · 53.2% of games
8.0mixed
33.3%
4W–8L · 45.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 42% of the time
#1 Doubles
42%
87 matches
#2 Doubles
30%
63 matches
#3 Doubles
21%
43 matches
#3 Singles
4%
9 matches
#1 Singles
2%
5 matches
#4 Doubles
1%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Start where you are. Use what you have. Do what you can.
Arthur Ashe