← Search

Grace Kurec Shahnazary

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
W Bloomfield, MI
4.0S year-end 2026
i
Self-rated, or a medical appeal
110 matches · 57W–53L · seasons 2017–2026
Match history110 matches
W
2026-08-08 · FAC- Jam 18s 4.0 NW F3 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Stacey Mondragon championship
loading the estimate
7-5, 6-1
L
2026-08-07 · FAC- Jam 18s 4.0 NW F3 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Danielle Smith-Elliott championship
loading the estimate
3-6, 5-7
W
2026-07-31 · FAC- Jam 18s 4.0 NW F3 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Nisha Jam championship
loading the estimate
7-5, 6-4
L
2026-07-31 · FAC- Jam 18s 4.0 NW F3 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Heather Enright championship
loading the estimate
1-6, 6-1, 0-1
W
2026-07-20 · NAC-Mondragon 55s 8.0 DW F · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Stacey Mondragon
loading the estimate
6-3, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-07-13 · NAC-Mondragon 55s 8.0 DW F · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Stacey Mondragon
loading the estimate
6-7, 2-6
L
2026-07-09 · FAC-Blume 55s 9.0 NW · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Leimomi Respicio
loading the estimate
0-6, 2-6
W
2026-07-07 · FAC- Jam 18s 4.0 NW F3 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Nikki Smith
loading the estimate
6-7, 7-5, 1-0
L
2026-06-29 · NAC-Mondragon 55s 8.0 DW F · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Janine Boksha
loading the estimate
4-6, 7-5, 0-1
W
2026-06-23 · FAC- Jam 18s 4.0 NW F3 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Nisha Jam
loading the estimate
6-3, 2-6, 1-0
W
2026-06-16 · FAC- Jam 18s 4.0 NW F3 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Nisha Jam
loading the estimate
4-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
2026-06-11 · FAC-Steiner 40s 4.0 NW F3 · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Rangsiyakorn Garber
loading the estimate
7-6, 6-7, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams29 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
0.0
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
4.0
62.5%
25W–15L · 56.8% of games
4.5
54.2%
13W–11L · 48.4% of games
8.0
40%
6W–9L · 47.4% of games
9.0
20%
2W–8L · 36.7% of games
8.0mixed
43.8%
7W–9L · 49.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 30% of the time
#1 Doubles
30%
33 matches
#2 Doubles
29%
32 matches
#3 Doubles
23%
25 matches
#1 Singles
6%
7 matches
#4 Doubles
4%
4 matches
#2 Singles
3%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Experience is a big word. I think it comes with time, and I have that.
Serena Williams