← Search

Mary Burke

Eagle, ID
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
254 matches · 151W–103L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Mary Burke to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history254 matches
L
2026-09-02 · Mixed Signals · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Steve Elwer mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 4-6
W
2026-08-24 · Mixed Signals · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Caleb Roope mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 6-1
L
2026-08-10 · Mixed Signals · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Caleb Roope mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 7-5, 1-0
W
2026-08-04 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Judah Dorn mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-07-27 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Fazal Shariff mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 6-3
L
2026-07-22 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Dylan Lucas mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 1-6
W
N/A
2026-07-16 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Brian Peterson mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-06-16 · Net Chix 55 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Dawn Crochet
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 4-6, 0-1
L
2026-06-14 · #3 Doubles · with Christian Lim championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
W
2026-06-13 · #3 Doubles · with Christian Lim championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-06-12 · #3 Doubles · with Judah Dorn championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-7, 1-0
W
2026-06-02 · Net Chix 55 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Christine Elwer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams43 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
3.5
71%
44W–18L · 59.3% of games
4.0
42.1%
24W–33L · 48.2% of games
7.0
80.8%
21W–5L · 62.4% of games
8.0
36.4%
8W–14L · 46.3% of games
7.0mixed
70.8%
17W–7L · 58.1% of games
7.5mixed
52.9%
9W–8L · 51.6% of games
8.0mixed
53.3%
8W–7L · 50.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 35% of the time
#3 Doubles
35%
89 matches
#2 Doubles
34%
85 matches
#1 Doubles
32%
80 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams