← Search

Kathy Brashear

Boise, ID
4.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
241 matches · 173W–68L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Kathy Brashear to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history241 matches
W
2026-09-08 · Honey Badgers · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Mike Buckingham mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 2-1
L
2026-08-18 · Honey Badgers · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Mike Buckingham mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 3-6, 0-1
W
2026-08-15 · #2 Doubles · with Willie Lafrades championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-08-14 · #1 Doubles · with Willie Lafrades championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 7-5, 0-1
W
2026-08-13 · Honey Badgers · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Mike Buckingham mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-08-03 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Tim Cowles mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 4-6
W
2026-08-01 · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Lisa Sliger
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
W
2026-07-29 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Matt Green mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 6-3
W
2026-07-26 · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Mary Westbrooke
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-1, 1-0
W
2026-07-22 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Willie Lafrades mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-1
L
2026-07-15 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Willie Lafrades mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 2-6, 0-1
W
2026-07-12 · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Karen Wells
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-4
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams122 teams · 2001–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
0.0
75%
3W–1L · 59.4% of games
4.5
86.6%
58W–9L · 66.1% of games
9.0
79.3%
23W–6L · 64.4% of games
10.0mixed
25%
1W–3L · 38.7% of games
8.0mixed
37.5%
3W–5L · 44.7% of games
8.5mixed
69.2%
9W–4L · 59.7% of games
9.0mixed
70%
21W–9L · 58% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 37% of the time
#1 Doubles
37%
90 matches
#3 Doubles
33%
79 matches
#2 Doubles
30%
72 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert