Search

Kathy Brashear

Boise, ID
4.5C year-end 2025
234 matches · 169W–65L · seasons 20192026
Bump probability
4.04.55.0lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

4.40
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 14 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 4.0
89%
stay 4.5
11%
up to 5.0
Projected to December: 0% down · 97% stay · 3% up, from a year-end estimate of 4.34. Lower than today’s 4.40 because form regresses — players this far into their band partway through a season have historically finished nearer the middle of it. Keep playing at this level and the numbers above are the ones that hold.

A 4.5 runs from 4.01 to 4.50. This rating sits in the top of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Teams110 teams · 2001–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Kathy has been 4.5 for all 8 seasons on record, but moved a long way inside it — from the middle of the band to the top.

4.04.520192020202120222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 4.5, Kathy has gone from the 96th to the 96th percentile of players at that level, 2019 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level7 levels played
0.0
75%
3W–1L · 59.4% of games
4.5
86.4%
57W–9L · 65.8% of games
9.0
79.3%
23W–6L · 64.4% of games
10.0mixed
25%
1W–3L · 38.7% of games
8.0mixed
42.9%
3W–4L · 46.2% of games
8.5mixed
70%
7W–3L · 62.9% of games
9.0mixed
70%
21W–9L · 58% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history234 matches
W
Raymond Verveckken / Patricia Bergstrandmixed
2026-07-29 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Matt Green
+0.000better than expected — took 62% of games against 55% expected
7-5, 6-3
W
Holly Sample / Dana Rosellini
2026-07-26 · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Mary Westbrooke
+0.002about as expected — took 59% of games against 57% expected
3-6, 6-1, 1-0
W
Dylan Lucas / Mary Burkemixed
2026-07-22 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Willie Lafrades
+0.000better than expected — took 86% of games against 54% expected
6-1, 6-1
L
Rachel Kincheloe / Bob Haycockmixed
2026-07-15 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Willie Lafrades
+0.000below expectation — took 43% of games against 53% expected
5-7, 6-2, 1-0
W
Leiana Almaraz / Anya Sandusky
2026-07-12 · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Karen Wells
+0.021better than expected — took 71% of games against 58% expected
6-1, 6-4
L
Kellee Bates / Rilee Moorhead
2026-07-10 · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Karen Wells
0.018below expectation — took 50% of games against 56% expected
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
Raymond Otto / Brijean Brennanmixed
2026-07-06 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Tim Cowles
+0.000below expectation — took 20% of games against 48% expected
6-1, 6-2
W
Jo Ann Kurz / Andrea Gillis
2026-07-01 · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Laura Larsen
+0.020better than expected — took 47% of games against 41% expected
2-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
Debbie Merritt / Shelley Ware
2026-06-29 · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Carmen Little
0.017about as expected — took 65% of games against 67% expected
7-6, 6-1
W
Maji Daines / Alexandra Hodson
2026-06-25 · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Jody Mallane
0.008about as expected — took 52% of games against 56% expected
6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W
Emily Flores / Kellee Bates
2026-06-23 · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Jody Mallane
+0.005better than expected — took 67% of games against 61% expected
6-4, 6-2
W
Carmen Little / Shelley Ware
2026-04-27 · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Karen Wells
+0.013better than expected — took 71% of games against 61% expected
6-2, 6-3
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.