← Search

Rachel Kincheloe

Caldwell, ID
4.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
291 matches · 211W–80L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Rachel Kincheloe to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history291 matches
L
2026-09-08 · Ladies of Leisure · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Marnie Newton
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 1-6
W
2026-09-01 · Simply Smashing · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Karl Baughman mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-2
L
2026-08-20 · Simply Smashing · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Karl Baughman mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 6-3, 0-1
W
2026-08-18 · Simply Smashing · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Brian Johnson mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-4
W
2026-08-15 · #1 Doubles · with Eric Hallingstad championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-5
W
2026-08-14 · #3 Doubles · with Eric Hallingstad championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 2-6, 1-0
W
2026-08-11 · Simply Smashing · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Ross Hoffman mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-4
W
2026-07-29 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Eric Hallingstad mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-07-20 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Bob Haycock mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-1
W
2026-07-15 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Bob Haycock mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 6-2, 1-0
W
Heather Evans / JJ Amaya
2026-07-11 · #2 Doubles · with Eric Hallingstad championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
Brennan Price / Seda Sargsyan
2026-07-11 · #2 Doubles · with Eric Hallingstad championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams40 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
4.5
94%
63W–4L · 66.2% of games
8.0
77.8%
7W–2L · 59.3% of games
9.0
50%
5W–5L · 49.4% of games
8.0mixed
67.6%
25W–12L · 57.6% of games
8.5mixed
69.4%
25W–11L · 57.1% of games
9.0mixed
65%
26W–14L · 57.7% of games
9.5mixed
57.1%
4W–3L · 55.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 44% of the time
#1 Doubles
44%
128 matches
#2 Doubles
34%
100 matches
#3 Doubles
22%
63 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer