← Search

Mike Buckingham

Boise, ID
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
230 matches · 139W–91L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Mike Buckingham to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history230 matches
W
2026-09-09 · Glad to be alive · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jeffrey Henken
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
W
2026-09-08 · Honey Badgers · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Kathy Brashear mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 2-1
L
2026-08-18 · Honey Badgers · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Kathy Brashear mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 3-6, 0-1
W
2026-08-17 · Glad to be alive · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jeff Seals
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
W
2026-08-13 · Honey Badgers · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Kathy Brashear mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-08-12 · Glad to be alive · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jeff Seals
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 7-6
L
2026-08-05 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Laura Larsen mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 6-1, 0-1
W
2026-08-05 · Glad to be alive · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jeffrey Henken
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-07-22 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Lisa Trujillo-Dunn mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-07-20 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Sandra Cashen mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 1-6
W
2026-07-13 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Nicole Hancock mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-4
L
2026-07-06 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Anne Marie Carlisle mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 1-6, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams43 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level9 levels played
4.0
100%
6W–0L · 63.2% of games
4.5
70.9%
61W–25L · 57.2% of games
8.0
73.9%
17W–6L · 60.6% of games
9.0
88.9%
16W–2L · 64.9% of games
10.0mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
33.3%
4W–8L · 44.7% of games
8.5mixed
44.1%
15W–19L · 47.3% of games
9.0mixed
46.2%
12W–14L · 50% of games
9.5mixed
50%
2W–2L · 52.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 40% of the time
#2 Doubles
40%
92 matches
#3 Doubles
36%
83 matches
#1 Doubles
22%
51 matches
#2 Singles
1%
3 matches
#1 Singles
0%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Success is a journey, not a destination. The doing is often more important than the outcome.
Arthur Ashe