← Search

Russell Moorhead

Boise, ID
3.5A year-end 2025
i
Appeal — granted on request, not computed
212 matches · 110W–102L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Russell Moorhead to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history212 matches
W
2026-09-01 · Bangers 65 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Joseph Brennan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
W
2026-08-27 · Bangers 65 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jake Putnam
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
W
2026-08-20 · Bangers 65 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Norm Waite
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-7, 1-0
W
2026-08-18 · Bangers 65 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Victor Allen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
L
2026-08-17 · Buds Potential-65 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Victor Allen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
W
2026-08-15 · #1 Doubles · with Rachel Moorhead championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
L
2026-08-14 · #3 Doubles · with Rachel Moorhead championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-2, 0-1
W
2026-08-13 · Bangers 65 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Dave Keim
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 0-6, 1-0
W
2026-08-11 · Bangers 65 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Dave Keim
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
W
2026-08-06 · Bangers 65 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Dave Keim
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
W
2026-08-05 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Rachel Moorhead mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-3
L
2026-08-03 · Buds Potential-65 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Victor Allen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams40 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
4.0
39.2%
20W–31L · 47.4% of games
7.0
90.9%
10W–1L · 62.1% of games
8.0
63.5%
33W–19L · 54.4% of games
9.0
0%
0W–4L · 27.3% of games
7.5mixed
66.7%
4W–2L · 50% of games
8.0mixed
53.1%
17W–15L · 49.9% of games
8.5mixed
40%
12W–18L · 48.7% of games
9.0mixed
58.3%
7W–5L · 51.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 40% of the time
#1 Doubles
40%
85 matches
#2 Doubles
34%
72 matches
#3 Doubles
20%
43 matches
#1 Singles
4%
8 matches
#2 Singles
2%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to take the initiative and play your game. Confidence is just believing you can do it.
Chris Evert