← Search

Kimberly Clifford

Boise, ID
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
255 matches · 142W–113L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Kimberly Clifford to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history255 matches
L
2026-09-01 · Honey Badgers · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Nick Wecker mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 3-6
L
2026-08-18 · Honey Badgers · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Ken Coffey mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 2-6, 0-1
L
2026-08-05 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Justin Endow mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 3-6
L
2026-07-27 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Timothy Brown mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 1-6
W
2026-04-23 · Shot Sisters · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Linda Western
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
W
2026-04-09 · Shot Sisters · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Linda Western
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 7-6, 1-0
W
2025-09-16 · Honey Badgers · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Jeff Buckingham mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-4
L
2025-09-09 · Honey Badgers · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Trever Browne mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 6-3, 0-1
L
2025-09-04 · Honey Badgers · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Mike Buckingham mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 1-6
L
2025-09-02 · Honey Badgers · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Jeff Buckingham mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 6-4, 0-1
L
2025-08-23 · #3 Doubles · with Justin Endow championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 5-7
L
2025-08-22 · #1 Doubles · with Robert Miranda championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 0-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams33 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
3.5
87.1%
27W–4L · 63.8% of games
4.0
52.2%
47W–43L · 50.1% of games
8.0
28.6%
2W–5L · 46.9% of games
7.0mixed
66.7%
6W–3L · 58.1% of games
7.5mixed
57.1%
4W–3L · 56.6% of games
8.0mixed
60.7%
34W–22L · 53.7% of games
8.5mixed
31.8%
7W–15L · 44.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 34% of the time
#1 Doubles
34%
86 matches
#3 Doubles
29%
73 matches
#2 Doubles
25%
63 matches
#1 Singles
11%
27 matches
#2 Singles
2%
6 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You can get through anything if you keep going one point at a time.
Arthur Ashe