← Search

Trever Browne

Eagle, ID
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
265 matches · 150W–115L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Trever Browne to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history265 matches
L
2026-09-02 · Hit It From the Backhand · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Stacey Walker mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 4-6
W
2026-09-01 · Honey Badgers · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Lauren Drew mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 7-6
W
2026-08-20 · Honey Badgers · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Mary Westbrooke mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-2
W
2026-08-18 · Honey Badgers · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Michelle Phillips mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
2026-08-17 · Hit It From the Backhand · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Tiffany Roberts mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 6-4, 0-1
W
Daigo Ishikawa / Josiah Garlan
2026-08-08 · #3 Doubles · with Ross Hoffman championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 7-5
L
Pawel Mankowski
2026-08-07 · #2 Singles championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
W
2026-07-18 · #2 Singles championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
L
2026-07-17 · #2 Singles championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
W
2026-06-29 · Over Served 18s · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-4
W
2026-06-22 · Over Served 18s · #2 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-0
W
2026-06-18 · Tennis the MenUs · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Jacob Roberts
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams35 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
4.0
75%
45W–15L · 60.5% of games
4.5
44.6%
29W–36L · 51.6% of games
7.5mixed
66.7%
18W–9L · 57.4% of games
8.0mixed
52%
13W–12L · 53.4% of games
8.5mixed
65%
13W–7L · 53.1% of games
9.0mixed
28%
7W–18L · 45.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 31% of the time
#1 Doubles
31%
81 matches
#2 Doubles
22%
58 matches
#3 Doubles
20%
53 matches
#1 Singles
16%
42 matches
#2 Singles
12%
31 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer