← Search

Ryan van de Graaff

Eagle, ID
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
141 matches · 81W–60L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Ryan van de Graaff to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history141 matches
L
2026-09-08 · The Hounds · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Kellee Bates mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L
2026-08-20 · The Hounds · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Kellee Bates mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 2-6
L
2026-07-29 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Colette van de Graaff mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 3-6
W
2026-07-22 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Angie O'Hara mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 7-6, 1-0
W
2026-07-15 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Colette van de Graaff mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
2026-07-08 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Colette van de Graaff mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 3-6
W
2026-06-29 · Shank'd It 4.0 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with William van de Graaff
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
W
2026-06-24 · Shank'd It 4.0 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with William van de Graaff
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
L
2026-06-23 · Overserved 55's · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Ron Kristensen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 5-7
L
2026-06-22 · Shank'd It 4.0 · #2 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-7, 0-1
W
2026-06-11 · Overserved 55's · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Ron Kristensen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-06-04 · Overserved 55's · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Ron Kristensen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams28 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
4.0
64%
32W–18L · 58.6% of games
4.5
45.9%
17W–20L · 48.4% of games
8.0
80%
4W–1L · 62.8% of games
7.0mixed
83.3%
5W–1L · 59.8% of games
7.5mixed
75%
3W–1L · 54% of games
8.0mixed
50%
10W–10L · 49.5% of games
8.5mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 43% of the time
#1 Doubles
43%
60 matches
#3 Doubles
28%
40 matches
#2 Doubles
25%
35 matches
#2 Singles
4%
5 matches
#1 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova